Re: [vote] Ant 1.6 : further release plan

2003-10-14 Thread Emmanuel Feller
- Message d'origine - De : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : mardi 14 octobre 2003 18:30 Objet : RE: [vote] Ant 1.6 : further release plan [...] > > ...this is a recurrent problem in OSS software: people steer clear of > > code till the x.0 release ships, it 'releases'

Re: Getting people to test the beta

2003-10-14 Thread Emmanuel Feller
I think it could be a good seduction operation ... :) I will try to get time to contribute. Emmanuel - Message d'origine - De : "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : mardi 14 octobre 2003 11:21 Objet : Getting people to test the beta > Hi, > > this is ju

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-09 Thread Emmanuel Feller
;s my opinion) than ant should not provide stuff for unofficial way, because you risk to mix the image. >Jose Alberto Emmanuel > -Original Message- > From: Emmanuel Feller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2003 13:29 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: fail

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-09 Thread Emmanuel Feller
age that gets executed. ANT is not a procedural language, that I agree, but it is a script. > -Original Message- > From: Emmanuel Feller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 09 October 2003 12:26 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: failonerror; general solution > > &

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-09 Thread Emmanuel Feller
Hello, I not agree on all ... The is not a good thing, and especially in big builds. My builds are quite comlex and I reduce complexity by developping my own tasks : this is the official way and (IMHO) should be promoted. I developped wrapper around conditionnal things but now I have access to m

Re: failonerror; general solution

2003-10-03 Thread Emmanuel Feller
I agree, it is a good option in my mind. +1 :) Emmanuel - Message d'origine - De : "Jan Schroeder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : vendredi 3 octobre 2003 16:38 Objet : failonerror; general solution > There are a few new entries in bugzilla regarding handling of >

Re: com.kvisco classes for XslpLiaison

2003-09-27 Thread Emmanuel Feller
I send them by private mail. Emmanuel - Message d'origine - De : "Antoine Lévy-Lambert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Envoyé : vendredi 26 septembre 2003 15:46 Objet : com.kvisco classes for XslpLiaison > Has anyone on the list the com.kvisco classes w

Re: Librairies needed to complete a full build

2003-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Feller
n I propose to flag the xlspliaison as deprecated because of lack of dispo of xlsp. I will submit a patch in this way and for the manual to the labrairy dependancies page. Emmanuel - Message d'origine - De : "Emmanuel Feller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> À : "Ant Developers Li

Librairies needed to complete a full build

2003-09-20 Thread Emmanuel Feller
Hello, I am looking for the librairies needed to proceed a full build of Ant. I have not some of them, like the weblogic, perforce, starteam, vaj... where could i get them ? Is there a location where they are available ? I know they are optionnal but i am looking on wrapping some task like the v

Re: [VOTE] Ant/Antcall Returning properties and references [WAS] Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

2003-08-28 Thread Emmanuel Feller
Hello, As I am not a commiter i don't may vote, but i would like to explain my point of view on this proposal. I don't think that it is a good way. because ant build file are not script file and include some returning sub project will be use as a function : this is the first foot to scripting lang

RE : [new tasks] presetdef and macrodef

2003-08-14 Thread Emmanuel FELLER
>-Message d'origine- >De : peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Envoyé : jeudi 14 août 2003 11:21 >À : [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Objet : [new tasks] presetdef and macrodef > > >Hi, >I have written a couple of tasks to enable definition of new tasks >in ant. > > (formally known as extendtype)

RE : Recursive properties resolution ?

2003-08-13 Thread Emmanuel FELLER
>-Message d'origine- >De : Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Envoyé : mardi 12 août 2003 18:37 >À : Ant Developers List >Objet : Re: Recursive properties resolution ? [snip/] >> So if i keep multiple file (one per project/env couple), i >have multiple >> and cross redundancy. An

Recursive properties resolution ?

2003-08-12 Thread Emmanuel FELLER
Hi, I read the archive about the recursive properties and I am not convinced so i would like to reopen the debate. (Or i may have missed the good mail, if so correct me). Excuse the long mail, but i prefer explain all my problem. I do the all J2EE project build of my firm, the build process is e