Re: AW: [Fwd: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0]

2005-05-25 Thread Jesse Glick
The Schema file is there to support GUI tools for example. They could prompt for required attributes, This would be nice! let you select enumerated attributes from a list, FWIW, NetBeans would not need this - currently loads the EnumeratedAttribute subclass on the fly and uses it for code

AW: [Fwd: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0]

2005-05-24 Thread Jan . Materne
(*) Extension tasks Make extending Ant as simple as possible, i.e. drop a jar file in a specific directory (ANT_HOME/ext globally or ~/.ant/ext on a user by user basis). This jar file must include taskdefs to define the tasks, Schema files to describe the tasks and documentation in the

Re: [Fwd: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0]

2005-05-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 24 May 2005, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I like the 3rd paragraph I still do as well. I'm just not sure that XML Schema would be the way to go. /** Returns all names of required attributes. */ public static String[] getRequiredAttributes(); Doesn't help

Re: [Fwd: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0]

2005-05-24 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 24 May 2005, Jan Materne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I like the 3rd paragraph I still do as well. I'm just not sure that XML Schema would be the way to go. no, I think we all under stand XSD that much better now :( /** Returns all names of

[Fwd: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0]

2005-05-23 Thread Steve Loughran
This is just something I have in my archive from long ago, discussion on what was needed for Ant 1.3 and up. I note that some of them, like XML docs, are still on the todo list :( Original Message Subject: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0 Date: 27 Oct 2000 14:29:07 +0200

Re: [Fwd: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0]

2005-05-23 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 23 May 2005, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is just something I have in my archive from long ago, discussion on what was needed for Ant 1.3 and up. Someday I'll go and dig out a five year old mail to hold against you ;-) Stefan

Re: [Fwd: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0]

2005-05-23 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Mon, 23 May 2005, Steve Loughran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is just something I have in my archive from long ago, discussion on what was needed for Ant 1.3 and up. Someday I'll go and dig out a five year old mail to hold against you ;-) pick one where I dont

Re: [Fwd: Some Thoughts on Ant 1.3 and 2.0]

2005-05-23 Thread Alexey Solofnenko
I would also add parallel executor. - Alexey. -- Alexey N. Solofnenko trelony at gmail.com http://gmail.com home: http://trelony.cjb.net/ Pleasant Hill, CA (GMT-8 hours usually)