On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> does gump start ant builds in a new VM ?
Each project in a VM of its own, yes.
> Can it be that the security manager which gump is using is
> preventing these permissions from being granted in ant ?
I don't think that there
Message -
From: "Stefan Bodewig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 9:39 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and
JUnit task
> On 28 Aug 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On 28 Aug 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While you are at it, PermissionsTest fails in Gump for me.
the gory details (it doesn't fail if I run it interactively, my locale
settings are different when using Gump which runs via cron, I don't
see any other difference at first glanc
On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> JavaTest fails under IDEA with the new CVS HEAD. I need to have a
> look to see what is happening.
While you are at it, PermissionsTest fails in Gump for me.
Stefan
--
ROTECTED]>
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and
JUnit task
> Hi,
> Stefan,
> you are right
> JavaTest fails under IDEA with the new CVS
To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to
Java task and JUnit
task
Hi,
Stefan,
you are right
JavaTest fails under IDEA with the new CVS HEAD.
I need to have a look to see what is ha
PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adding Permissions / Security Manager to Java task and
JUnit task
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am +1. Indeed, I have patched my own copy and been playing with
> > it.
>
> Fine, I didn't have the tim
Steve Loughran wrote :
>One option could be to say that the combination of fork==false &&
>failonerror!=null turns on the security manager, as setting the
>failonerror flag in a non-forked was meaningless till now -we
>couldnt catch the failure to decide whether or not to act on it.
I still n
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am +1. Indeed, I have patched my own copy and been playing with
> it.
Fine, I didn't have the time to do the same, yet.
I'm mainly concerned about how this would affect IDE integration (I
know NetBeans has already set a SecurityM
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
See :
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22533
I am quoting Martijn Kruithof :
The following bug reports are associated with Security Manager issues:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6323 and
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
+1
Costin
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> See :
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22533
>
> I am quoting Martijn Kruithof :
>
> The following bug reports are associated with Security Manager issues:
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6323 and
> http://issues.a
See :
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22533
I am quoting Martijn Kruithof :
The following bug reports are associated with Security Manager issues:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6323 and
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11459
I have written an
12 matches
Mail list logo
