+1
Martijn
Op 11-3-2013 15:05, Peter Reilly schreef:
+1
Peter
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart
jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on the release as is too
Works perfectly in easyant :)
2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
+1 on the release as is.
On
+1
Peter
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart
jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 on the release as is too
Works perfectly in easyant :)
2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
+1 on the release as is.
On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
You can veto
+1 on the release as is too
Works perfectly in easyant :)
2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org
+1 on the release as is.
On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would
then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and
+1 on the release as is.
On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would
then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build.
Maybe I'm picking nits: you can't veto a release, this is a majority
vote.
Stefan
“Changes that could break older environments” fails to list the Java 5
requirement!
Typo in WHATSNEW: “NullPointerExcpetion”
Otherwise, +1.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
For additional commands,
Good catch, Jesse. I have to admit I find the lack of a mention of
requiring Java 5 troubling. That is definitely a difference people are
going to care about.
Is it possible to sneak that edit in to the WHATSNEW file (in both the
bin and src packages) without a whole new revote?
On 13-03-08
Hello Bruce,
the WHATSNEW is included in the bin and the src package so to change it a new
vote would be required. In fact a new build would be required.
You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have
to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build.
Yes, that is what I thought.
I think your answer is a good compromise. +1 on the vote.
On 08/03/2013 2:10 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Hello Bruce,
the WHATSNEW is included in the bin and the src package so to change it a new
vote would be required. In fact a new build would be required.
+1
Maarten
From: Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de
To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:47 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]
Adding that I had forgotten to put the .asc files, this is now
Adding that I had forgotten to put the .asc files, this is now uploaded too.
On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:16 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Hi,
I have uploaded candidate artifacts a second time for an ant 1.9.0 release to
: http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ after having incorporated the
Hi,
I have uploaded candidate artifacts a second time for an ant 1.9.0 release to :
http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ after having incorporated the patches
of Michael Clarke concerning JUnit.
Let's vote on releasing Ant 1.9.0 a second time.
Let' start with my own +1
Regards,
Antoine
11 matches
Mail list logo