Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-13 Thread Martijn Kruithof
+1 Martijn Op 11-3-2013 15:05, Peter Reilly schreef: +1 Peter On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote: +1 on the release as is too Works perfectly in easyant :) 2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org +1 on the release as is. On

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-11 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 Peter On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Jean-Louis Boudart jeanlouis.boud...@gmail.com wrote: +1 on the release as is too Works perfectly in easyant :) 2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org +1 on the release as is. On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: You can veto

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-10 Thread Jean-Louis Boudart
+1 on the release as is too Works perfectly in easyant :) 2013/3/9 Stefan Bodewig bode...@apache.org +1 on the release as is. On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
+1 on the release as is. On 2013-03-08, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build. Maybe I'm picking nits: you can't veto a release, this is a majority vote. Stefan

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-08 Thread Jesse Glick
“Changes that could break older environments” fails to list the Java 5 requirement! Typo in WHATSNEW: “NullPointerExcpetion” Otherwise, +1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-08 Thread Bruce Atherton
Good catch, Jesse. I have to admit I find the lack of a mention of requiring Java 5 troubling. That is definitely a difference people are going to care about. Is it possible to sneak that edit in to the WHATSNEW file (in both the bin and src packages) without a whole new revote? On 13-03-08

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-08 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hello Bruce, the WHATSNEW is included in the bin and the src package so to change it a new vote would be required. In fact a new build would be required. You can veto the release if it matters that much to you and I would then have to drop and recreate the 1.9.0 label and do a new build.

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-08 Thread Bruce Atherton
Yes, that is what I thought. I think your answer is a good compromise. +1 on the vote. On 08/03/2013 2:10 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hello Bruce, the WHATSNEW is included in the bin and the src package so to change it a new vote would be required. In fact a new build would be required.

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-07 Thread Maarten Coene
+1 Maarten From: Antoine Levy Lambert anto...@gmx.de To: Ant Developers List dev@ant.apache.org Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2013 2:47 AM Subject: Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt] Adding that I had forgotten to put the .asc files, this is now

Re: [VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-06 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Adding that I had forgotten to put the .asc files, this is now uploaded too. On Mar 5, 2013, at 11:16 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote: Hi, I have uploaded candidate artifacts a second time for an ant 1.9.0 release to : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ after having incorporated the

[VOTE] Ant 1.9.0 release [2nd attempt]

2013-03-05 Thread Antoine Levy Lambert
Hi, I have uploaded candidate artifacts a second time for an ant 1.9.0 release to : http://people.apache.org/~antoine/dist/ after having incorporated the patches of Michael Clarke concerning JUnit. Let's vote on releasing Ant 1.9.0 a second time. Let' start with my own +1 Regards, Antoine