[VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-08-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
pgpxlIZvtMBmz.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-08-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 just in case your mail client doesn't like the way our mailing list manager deals with multipart/signed messages (just like mine, it simply doesn't see the signed part, only the signature), here is what I wrote: > Hi all, > > I've uploaded distributi

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-08-27 Thread Peter Reilly
+1 Peter On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:44 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > just in case your mail client doesn't like the way our mailing list > manager deals with multipart/signed messages (just like mine, it > simply doesn't see the

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-09-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The vote runs for a week and needs 3 PMC member +1s to pass (and >> more +1s than -1s). Six days and two PMC member votes later. I'd appreciate it if any other PMC member could take a look at the proposed beta release. Stefan --

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-09-02 Thread Kevin Jackson
Hi, > Six days and two PMC member votes later. > > I'd appreciate it if any other PMC member could take a look at the > proposed beta release. Sorry I haven't had chance to take a look yet :( Kev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAI

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-09-02 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Wed, 27 Aug 2008, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The vote runs for a week and needs 3 PMC member +1s to pass (and more +1s than -1s). Six days and two PMC member votes later. I'd appreciate it if any other PMC member could take a look at the proposed beta

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-09-02 Thread Petar Tahchiev
Hi, I know my vote is not binding but still. I downloaded both the bin and the src archives. I found no problems with the archives, whatsoever. The build went smooth, and it failed with Ant 1.6.5 So here is my +1 (not-binding). Cheers, Petar. 2008/9/2, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > S

Re: [VOTE] Release AntUnit 1.1 Beta 1

2008-09-02 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 2 Sep 2008, Petar Tahchiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The build went smooth, and it failed with Ant 1.6.5 It is supposed to (AntUnit requires 1.7.0+). > So here is my +1 (not-binding). Thanks Stefan - To uns