I would also prefer that cvs/svn/wiki messages not go to the dev-list, because - you could easier write your mail rules - not all people want to get these mails - not all must be hold on archives (it´s "archived" in the repo)
Jan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Freitag, 15. April 2005 21:39 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: RE: We have SVN > > > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Can we keep old [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address for SVN updates? > > > The commit messages just spam dev build list. > > > > Actually I thought we'd be getting the CVS commit mails there > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) as well. > > > > Does the majority of us want the commit mails go to a different list > > than [EMAIL PROTECTED] This is a simple configuration issue at > least Conor and > > myself can handle (I think you have to be a PMV chairman to > change the > > mailer configuration). > > Wiki changes also go to ant-cvs (so there's a precedent for non-CVS > stuff to go there). I would also prefer SVN commit emails to go there, > as I have a rule to handle ant-cvs, but if not I can always add more > rules to process [EMAIL PROTECTED] with svn commit: prefix in the header. > > But I kind of like to have ant-cvs separate, and when we reply to a > message from ant-cvs, the message to go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It separates the > auto-generated messages from the discussions about them (or > the changes > they report). ant-cvs messages go to a different email folder than > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for me. --DD > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >