I would also prefer that cvs/svn/wiki messages not go to the dev-list,
because
- you could easier write your mail rules
- not all people want to get these mails
- not all must be hold on archives (it´s "archived" in the repo)

Jan

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet am: Freitag, 15. April 2005 21:39
> An: Ant Developers List
> Betreff: RE: We have SVN
> 
> > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Can we keep old [EMAIL PROTECTED] email address for SVN updates?
> > > The commit messages just spam dev build list.
> > 
> > Actually I thought we'd be getting the CVS commit mails there
> > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) as well.
> > 
> > Does the majority of us want the commit mails go to a different list
> > than [EMAIL PROTECTED]  This is a simple configuration issue at 
> least Conor and
> > myself can handle (I think you have to be a PMV chairman to 
> change the
> > mailer configuration).
> 
> Wiki changes also go to ant-cvs (so there's a precedent for non-CVS
> stuff to go there). I would also prefer SVN commit emails to go there,
> as I have a rule to handle ant-cvs, but if not I can always add more
> rules to process [EMAIL PROTECTED] with svn commit: prefix in the header.
> 
> But I kind of like to have ant-cvs separate, and when we reply to a
> message from ant-cvs, the message to go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It separates the
> auto-generated messages from the discussions about them (or 
> the changes
> they report). ant-cvs messages go to a different email folder than
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for me. --DD
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Reply via email to