Re: Bz 62324

2018-06-09 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
2018-06-09 13:56 GMT+02:00 Jaikiran Pai : > > On 09/06/18 5:22 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > >> >> Thanks for review, Jaikiran. You're correct, that is the proposed >> solution, >> adding a separator >> (a newline followed by an exception name for clarity -- mind that >> exception >> is

Re: Bz 62324

2018-06-09 Thread Jaikiran Pai
On 09/06/18 5:22 PM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: Thanks for review, Jaikiran. You're correct, that is the proposed solution, adding a separator (a newline followed by an exception name for clarity -- mind that exception is logged only in debug mode). The exception class name would already be

Re: Bz 62324

2018-06-09 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
2018-06-09 13:31 GMT+02:00 Jaikiran Pai : > For easy reference, the bug in discussion is this one > https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62324 > > > On 09/06/18 12:38 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: > >> Namely, a stack trace of the exception is logged (in debug mode only) >> without

Re: Bz 62324

2018-06-09 Thread Jaikiran Pai
For easy reference, the bug in discussion is this one https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62324 On 09/06/18 12:38 AM, Gintautas Grigelionis wrote: Namely, a stack trace of the exception is logged (in debug mode only) without any separator from the preceding message. While it seems

Bz 62324

2018-06-08 Thread Gintautas Grigelionis
I was advised to solicit opinions regarding the change introduced as a fix for the abovementioned issue. It concerns how an event that has both a message and an exception is logged. Namely, a stack trace of the exception is logged (in debug mode only) without any separator from the preceding