Re: FailureRecorder problems in Gump

2008-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The root of the problem probably is that FailureRecorder expects the > Test instance passed into addFailure to be an instance of the class > under test - something that isn't true for JUnit4 wrapped tests in > Ant. it also assumes t

Re: FailureRecorder problems in Gump

2008-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 04 Apr 2008, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The strange thing is that even the oldest version of > JUnit4TestCaseFacade[3] I can find contains such a constructor. http://junit.cvs.sourceforge.net/junit/junit/junit/framework/JUnit4TestCaseFacade.java?hideattic=0&revision=1.2&v

FailureRecorder problems in Gump

2008-04-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all, we can finally see[1] why the tests fail in Gump (and this is the only remaining failure on vmgump, BTW) [junit] nested build's System.err: /srv/gump/public/workspace/ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/optional/out/FailedTests.java:9: cannot find symbol [junit] symbol : constructor