n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Ant Developers List
> Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 10:09:23 AM
> Subject: Re: Fixing some naming inconsistencies in Ivy
>
> Just pinging about this e-mail, I've had no answer so far, I think I can't
> make the choice alone, and we need to de
t: Saturday, March 29, 2008 10:09:23 AM
Subject: Re: Fixing some naming inconsistencies in Ivy
Just pinging about this e-mail, I've had no answer so far, I think I can't
make the choice alone, and we need to deal with that question before
2.0final to close IVY-297. So, anyone has an opin
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 7:27 PM, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> ant attribute names are case insensitive.
Yes, but documentation use them in some form, and I wonder how many people
change the case from what is documented.
BTW, we could make Ivy support for attributes case insensitive t
ant attribute names are case insensitive.
I do not like long attribute names - although I have created
a fair few my self.
Peter
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
> > X
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:55 PM, Stephane Bailliez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Xavier Hanin wrote:
> > Just pinging about this e-mail, I've had no answer so far, I think I
> can't
> > make the choice alone, and we need to deal with that question before
> > 2.0final to close IVY-297. So, anyone ha
Xavier Hanin wrote:
Just pinging about this e-mail, I've had no answer so far, I think I can't
make the choice alone, and we need to deal with that question before
2.0final to close IVY-297. So, anyone has an opinion about this:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On 29/02/2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As reported by IVY-297, Ivy suffers from some name inconsistencies and
> strange attribute names. Ivy 2.0 is a good opportunity to fix some of them,
> since I think we can afford some more deprecation warnings.
>
> So I'd like to
Just pinging about this e-mail, I've had no answer so far, I think I can't
make the choice alone, and we need to deal with that question before
2.0final to close IVY-297. So, anyone has an opinion about this:
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As r
Hi,
As reported by IVY-297, Ivy suffers from some name inconsistencies and
strange attribute names. Ivy 2.0 is a good opportunity to fix some of them,
since I think we can afford some more deprecation warnings.
So I'd like to fix IVY-297 by marking allownomd as deprecated, and providing
a descrip
