On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Jesse Glick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> We still support Ant 1.2, so we will certainly be supporting Ant
>> 1.5
>
> "Java 1.2" and "Java 1.5" I guess you meant.
Err, yes. *blush*
Stefan
-
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
We still support Ant 1.2, so we will certainly be supporting Ant 1.5
"Java 1.2" and "Java 1.5" I guess you meant.
Note that although JDK 6's javac does run annotation processors
automatically (no need for a separate tool), it does *not* accept those
written against the
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006, Mark McKay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was reading though the apt documentation, and it begins by saying
> that as of Java 1.6, apt may be obsolete and its functions
> incorporated into javac. Does this mean that the apt task will also
> be merged into the javac task?
Unli
I was reading though the apt documentation, and it begins by saying that
as of Java 1.6, apt may be obsolete and its functions incorporated into
javac. Does this mean that the apt task will also be merged into the
javac task?
Mark McKay
---
