Re: Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

2003-07-01 Thread Steve Loughran
Conor MacNeill wrote: On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:14 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, Problem 1 seems to be that the MANIFEST spec says that attributes cannot be repeated in one section while other specs say that you could do that for the Class-Path attribute in the main section. It seems that JDK 1.4.2 n

Re: Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

2003-07-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We can add a warning to the Manifest code, I guess and perhaps even > combine into a single attribute. The later can probably be only optional - I vaguely recall that some J2ME implementations required multiple Class-Path entries and

Re: Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

2003-07-01 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Mon, 30 Jun 2003 09:14 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi, > > Problem 1 seems to be that the MANIFEST spec says that attributes > cannot be repeated in one section while other specs say that you could > do that for the Class-Path attribute in the main section. It seems > that JDK 1.4.2 now emits w

Re: Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

2003-06-30 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi, PR 21170 showns to rather unrelated problems AFAIU, but I'd like some feedback - especially since Magesh and Conor have been through part of this for PR 4683 already. Problem 1 seems to be that the MANIFEST spec says that attributes cannot be repeated in one section while

Multiple Class-Path in MANIFEST.MF (PRs 4683 and 21170)

2003-06-30 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi, PR 21170 showns to rather unrelated problems AFAIU, but I'd like some feedback - especially since Magesh and Conor have been through part of this for PR 4683 already. Problem 1 seems to be that the MANIFEST spec says that attributes cannot be repeated in one section while other specs say that