Re: Namespace support in Ant 1.6

2003-12-05 Thread Christopher Lenz
Am 05.12.2003 um 18:53 schrieb Peter Reilly: Brilliant, With your blessing, I will copy this into the official ant manual. Sure. I want to add some more detail to the page over the weekend, and especially annotate some areas where I'm personally not quite happy with the namespace support yet. Ch

Re: Namespace support in Ant 1.6

2003-12-05 Thread Peter Reilly
Brilliant, With your blessing, I will copy this into the official ant manual. Peter Christopher Lenz wrote: Hi everyone, just a quick note that I've added some documentation to the Ant Wiki concerning the new namespace support. If I got the facts wrong somewhere, please correct it. Additions we

Namespace support in Ant 1.6

2003-12-05 Thread Christopher Lenz
Hi everyone, just a quick note that I've added some documentation to the Ant Wiki concerning the new namespace support. If I got the facts wrong somewhere, please correct it. Additions welcome, too, of course :-) http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?NewAntFeaturesInDetail/ XmlNamespac

RE: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Jim Fuller
>I know that these shortcommings would be mitigated by using NameSpaces, >but yet >I still want to be able to lump all my antlibs into the default >namespace and >use them without namespace stuff. which is why I suggested having an ant processor switch stating a) if namespace processing is on b

Re: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread peter reilly
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 16:49, Knut Wannheden wrote: > Regarding XML namespaces... > > Something else that would interest me is how namespaced attributes will be > handled. IMHO they should be allowed and ignored. But will a task > implementation have the ability to query them? Opps, at the

Re: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Knut Wannheden
Regarding XML namespaces... Something else that would interest me is how namespaced attributes will be handled. IMHO they should be allowed and ignored. But will a task implementation have the ability to query them? Cheers, --knut "peter reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAI

RE: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
to lump all my antlibs into the default namespace and use them without namespace stuff. Jose Alberto > Peter > > > > I guess I do not want to just provide our own > implementation, but to > > prove that we can offer a way for third parties to reshuffle their > > cod

Re: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The simplest way is to introduce roles. Sure - but then we are way out of Ant 1.6 land. At least if we take the released betas as an indication of what 1.6 was supposed to be. Stefan

Re: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread peter reilly
: 10 November 2003 18:21 > > To: Ant Developers List > > Subject: Namespace support in ant 1.6 > > > > > > Hi, > > I would like to get some movement on the outstanding issues > > if ant 1.6. > > > > One of the outstanding issues is what namespace to

Re: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Jose Alberto Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is there a way to redefine antcontrib's to make it show a > syntax like (c) eventhough is using (b) rules? Not as long as Ant doesn't typedef - and Ant can't do that unless we have a way to associate different classes with

RE: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
L PROTECTED] > Sent: 10 November 2003 18:21 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Namespace support in ant 1.6 > > > Hi, > I would like to get some movement on the outstanding issues > if ant 1.6. > > One of the outstanding issues is what namespace to use >

RE: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Jim Fuller
I'll just wade in here with my 2p. I agree that with the number of Ant based variants...maven, jelly etc... . and people embedding Ant inside their own applications that their is a need to avoid collision using namespacein addition this will also allow intermixing of Ant with other xml voca

Re: AW: AW: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread peter reilly
gt; -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. November 2003 10:15 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: AW: Namespace support in ant 1.6 > > On Tuesday 11 November 2003 08:57, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > &g

Re: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to get some movement on the outstanding issues > if ant 1.6. This is appreciated a lot by me. Thanks for going ahead, I appologize for letting the ball drop - I've been too busy with real-life and real-life work. > One

AW: AW: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Antoine Lévy-Lambert
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. November 2003 10:15 An: Ant Developers List Betreff: Re: AW: Namespace support in ant 1.6 On Tuesday 11 November 2003 08:57, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > >Von: peter reilly [mailto:

Re: AW: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread peter reilly
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 08:57, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > >Von: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Gesendet: Montag, 10. November 2003 19:21 > >An: Ant Developers List > >Betreff: Namespace support in ant 1.6 > > > > > >Hi, > >I wo

AW: Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-11 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
>Von: peter reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Gesendet: Montag, 10. November 2003 19:21 >An: Ant Developers List >Betreff: Namespace support in ant 1.6 >Hi, >I would like to get some movement on the outstanding issues >of ant 1.6. +1 >One of the outstanding issues

Namespace support in ant 1.6

2003-11-10 Thread peter reilly
Hi, I would like to get some movement on the outstanding issues if ant 1.6. One of the outstanding issues is what namespace to use for nested elements of tasks. (Discovered by introspection rules). The choices are: a) Use the default ant namespace, this is the current rule. b) Use the namespa