Re: PGP tasks

2005-05-09 Thread tefan Bodewig
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can count me in, Will do, please subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > though I'm not 100% convinced of the depth required here. Neither am I. > What do we plan to provide in a library beyond what BouncyCastle has > implemented? No

Re: PGP tasks

2005-05-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 09 May 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > we could always talk to the bouncy castle people about their > willingness to do an ant task? Which wouldn't solve the wagon issue, for example. Or an condition or selector or whatever other idea we cook up. Stefan -

Re: PGP tasks

2005-05-09 Thread Steve Loughran
Matt Benson wrote: --- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Sat, 7 May 2005, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] though we probably have to have a bit of discussion about objectives and gather together interested people first anyway. We can do that on commons-dev, and create the

Re: PGP tasks

2005-05-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You can count me in, Will do, please subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > though I'm not 100% convinced of the depth required here. Neither am I. > What do we plan to provide in a library beyond what BouncyCastle has > implemented? No

Re: PGP tasks

2005-05-09 Thread Matt Benson
--- Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 7 May 2005, Brett Porter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > > though we probably have to have a bit of > discussion about objectives > > and gather together interested people first > anyway. We can do that > > on commons-dev, and create th

Re: PGP tasks

2005-05-09 Thread Brett Porter
On 5/9/05, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Depends on what we intend to do there. commons-pgp or even > commons-openpgp if we want to stick with PGP might be better (we may > include support for encryption and decryption as well, that's why I > don't like "signing"). Commons PGP sound

Re: PGP tasks

2005-05-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Sat, 7 May 2005, Brett Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Maybe jakarta-commons as some "neutral ground"? The library itself >> could be useful beyond Ant and Maven. > > +1 for jakarta-commons. > > commons-signing? Depends on what we intend to do there. commons-pgp or even commons-openpg