On Sun, 6 Jul 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> So, I'd like to make PropertyHelper abstract and create a
> StandardPropertyHelper to implement the default behaviour. The
> factory method can remain in the abstract class. The PropertyHelper
> chaining could also stay
+1
> and per
I'd like to refactor PropertyHelper a bit and thought I'd get some opinions.
Currently PropertyHelper serves three different roles
1. The basic interface definition of a PropertyHelper
2. The implementation of the standard PropertyHelper
3. The factory for creating PropertyHelpers.
I'd like to s
