Re: PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-21 Thread Peter Reilly
Matt Benson wrote: Any thoughts on the propriety of adding public void iterator() { //return property NAMES } to PropertySet? This would make it easy to use with ant-contrib's task. Not that we have an obligation to do that, but I think it could be cool. It would be nice! Peter -Matt _

AW: AW: PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-21 Thread Jan . Materne
sendet am: Donnerstag, 21. April 2005 12:31 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: Re: AW: PropertySet.iterator() > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > I had a project where a code generator inserts one > interface statement > > - and that > > what missing. So

Re: AW: PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-21 Thread Peter Reilly
Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 21. April 2005 00:05 > An: Ant Developers List > Betreff: RE: PropertySet.iterator() > > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I will take your opinion as gospel, since you are the > > fath

Re: AW: PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-21 Thread Steve Loughran
---8-<---8-<---8-<---8-<---8-<---8-<---8-<---8-< -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 21. April 2005 07:58 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: AW: PropertySet.iterator() I

RE: PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-21 Thread Phil Weighill Smith
On this topic, what do people think of the ability to define a filter set from a property set, where each filter has the property's name and the property's value? Phil :n. On Wed, 2005-04-20 at 16:48 -0500, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Any tho

AW: PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-21 Thread Jan . Materne
rt java.util.Iterator; public class MyClass implements Iterable { public Iterator iterator() { return null; } } ---8-<---8-<---8-<---8-<---8-<---8-<---8-<---8-< -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E

AW: PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-21 Thread Jan . Materne
Title: AW: PropertySet.iterator() I had a project where a code generator inserts one interface statement - and that what missing. So I created just an empty interface to make the compiler happy. Couldnt we "backport" the Iterable interface? I played a little with these... - build

RE: PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-20 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I will take your opinion as gospel, since you are the > father of PropertySet, and since you agree with me ;) Note that I can't think of any use case for iterating over the property names selected by a propertyset, but I'm sure someone somewhere some

RE: PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-20 Thread Matt Benson
--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Any thoughts on the propriety of adding > > > > public java.util.Iterator iterator() { > > //return property NAMES > > } > > > > to PropertySet? This would make it easy to use > with >

RE: PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-20 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Any thoughts on the propriety of adding > > public java.util.Iterator iterator() { > //return property NAMES > } > > to PropertySet? This would make it easy to use with > ant-contrib's task. Not that we have an > obligation to do that, but

PropertySet.iterator()

2005-04-20 Thread Matt Benson
Any thoughts on the propriety of adding public void iterator() { //return property NAMES } to PropertySet? This would make it easy to use with ant-contrib's task. Not that we have an obligation to do that, but I think it could be cool. -Matt __