- Original Message -
From: "Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Ant Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 07:55
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement
> But where does it stop? also
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Goodnough" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 08:54
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Ant Task - Proposed Enhancement
> This new ant task has no support for running se
Yeah, if you put out in CVS, I'd be happy to play around with
it to see how it could fit for me.
Andy
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/13/2003 11:07:53 AM >>>
I am more minded to put the subant in there, with perhaps some minor
tweaks.
The reason to use a separate task when there are major changes in
fun
I am more minded to put the subant in there, with perhaps some minor tweaks.
The reason to use a separate task when there are major changes in
functionality are
(a) we can have more sensible defaults (here: property inheritance, and what
happens when you invoke a target called "" . I'd like that t
Mmm...spoken like someone with an emotional attachment to SubAnt due to
your involvement with it. Let's be constructive and stick with the
merits of my proposal because you've got some good points. BTW, this is
my first submittal to any open source project so let's approach this
from a "today's m
But where does it stop? also supports automatic ordering of the
projects called based on the declared dependencies of the projects in an XML
file... Should that go into as well? (granted, I didn't submit that,
it's only in my sandbox...)
According to your reasoning, features should have gone in
