> From: Wascally Wabbit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> At 05:26 AM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
>
> Yes, but Ant basically pretends they did not occur. It does
> not try to "deal" with anything. In my situation the error
> was an out-of-memory issue. There are some environment issues
> that Ant tries
At 05:26 AM 2/19/2004, you wrote:
> From: Wascally Wabbit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ant Developers,
>
> I've come across (ok stumbled across) an implementation
> detail of the new Ant 1.6.1 "keepGoing" mode. The way the
> code is currently written Ant keeps going even if an Error
> (not an Exce
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote:
From: Wascally Wabbit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ant Developers,
I've come across (ok stumbled across) an implementation
detail of the new Ant 1.6.1 "keepGoing" mode. The way the
code is currently written Ant keeps going even if an Error
(not an Exception) occurs. Thi
> From: Wascally Wabbit [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ant Developers,
>
> I've come across (ok stumbled across) an implementation
> detail of the new Ant 1.6.1 "keepGoing" mode. The way the
> code is currently written Ant keeps going even if an Error
> (not an Exception) occurs. This strikes me
