Re: JDK 1.1 support

2003-03-14 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003 10:55 am, Steve Loughran wrote: From: Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] 4. Drop all the Ant2 cruft from the website. I think it should be preserved. Some it is still interesting and worth keeping. By cruft I mean statements like We are currently hashing out design

Re: JDK 1.1 support

2003-03-14 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would be clearly documented Fine with me. I'd like to keep 1.6 compatible to JDK 1.1, though. When we make 1.2 a requirement, we'd better start using collections and URLClassloader

RE: JDK 1.1 support

2003-03-13 Thread Dominique Devienne
+1 -Original Message- From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 5:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: JDK 1.1 support I'd like to throw this up again. What are peoples thoughts on the following 1. Make Ant 1.6.x the last JDK 1.1 release. This would