On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Larry Shatzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is Ant supposed to lock the build file at runtime on windows?
No, and as I'm lucky to not use Windows (this may have to change soon,
*shudder*) I didn't know for sure. I simply expected it would do -
but Ant probably closes the file
> -Original Message-
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 6:54 AM
> To: 'Ant Developers List'
> Subject: RE: antcall and build.xml being modified.
>
> I do agree about not locking Ant into forcing r
> -Original Message-
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:45 AM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: antcall and build.xml being modified.
>
> Self-modifying builds are not a practice I would recommend.
>
L
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 12:32 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: antcall and build.xml being modified.
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Shatzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
> -Original Message-
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Self-modifying builds are not a practice I would recommend.
I actually disagree with that statement somewhat. As long as
the self-modification is controlled and static, it's actually
a good and powerful way to build
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I would like to have this documented as "undefined".
I agree and will change my blurb accordingly.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additiona
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 05:31 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> > If anything, I think this should be documented, since it is a
> > gotcha.
>
> Will do.
>
I would like to have this documented as "undefined". I don't think we should
be forced to reparse a build file in future just because we do so now. A
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003, Larry Shatzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When it is run the output is as follows:
As long as you are not using an OS like Windows that locks your build
file while Ant is running.
> I figured the output would have been this:
is just a thin layer on top of , it reparses the
