On Tue, 10 May 2005, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldnt it be better to have the version in front of the name to get
> all files together?
>
> ant-1.6.3.jar
> ant-1.6.4.jar
> ant-jsch-1.6.3.jar
> ant-jsch-1.6.4.jar
> ant-optional-1.6.3.jar
> ant-optional-1.6.4.jar
>
> 1.6.3-ant.jar
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-You must use rhino <=1.5R5 for JavaScript; 1.5R6 and 1.6 are not
compatible with BSH.
Do you mean BSF?
yes
Gump caught a few of the problems, I vaguely recall Rhino adpted back
to BSF, but I could be wrong. CVS
On Mon, 17 Jan 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -You must use rhino <=1.5R5 for JavaScript; 1.5R6 and 1.6 are not
> compatible with BSH.
Do you mean BSF?
Gump caught a few of the problems, I vaguely recall Rhino adpted back
to BSF, but I could be wrong. CVS HEAD of Apache BSF s
Peter Reilly wrote:
Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote:
Awesome! Can you write also ?
With current ant cvs one can use a filtermapper to use a scriptfilter:
self.setToken(self.getToken().toUpperCase());
We could think of adding ; something that lets you
write arbitrary tests in a condition. T
Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote:
Awesome! Can you write also ?
With current ant cvs one can use a filtermapper to use a scriptfilter:
self.setToken(self.getToken().toUpperCase());
Peter
- Alexey.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
Awesome! Can you write also ?
- Alexey.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks,
I had meant to place a warning on the test that it may fail in gump.
Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodewig 2004/12/13 02:11:31
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
Temporarily skip test that fail in Gump because of a Gump bug
Revision ChangesPath
1.444 +8 -0 ant/bu
Seems this change made something not happy on the JDK1.4 that Gump runs
(namely, that below). Does the bootstrap-ant script need to be aware of some
conditional compilation?
-
... Bootstrapping Ant Distribution
... Compiling Ant Classes
src/main/org/apac
> I do not know whether the problem is difficult to fix, I did not put
> much my nose in the Project/ProjectHelper2/InstrospectionHelper and
> tutti quanti
> core classes.
Same for me. It was easy to write the test - but I don´t know to write the
fix.
> I think that Jan just wants to avoid get
Dominique Devienne wrote:
I guess finding the regression is just one aspect of the equation, but I'm
kind of surprised this is simply put on the back burner like that...
Is this a difficult problem to fix? Or people simply don't mind getting on
error on duplicate targets? --DD
I do not know whet
I guess finding the regression is just one aspect of the equation, but I'm
kind of surprised this is simply put on the back burner like that...
Is this a difficult problem to fix? Or people simply don't mind getting on
error on duplicate targets? --DD
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL P
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I did not remove the dependency...
> > There was a change last week (409) to make target test depend
> > on target
> > run-single-test.
> >
> > I assume this was to allow:
> > ant test -Dtestcase=
>
> Yep:
> ant test -->
> I did not remove the dependency...
> There was a change last week (409) to make target test depend
> on target
> run-single-test.
>
> I assume this was to allow:
> ant test -Dtestcase=
Yep:
ant test --> ant run-tests--> use all testcases
ant test -Dtestcase=...
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Peter,
I do not understand why you removed the dependency of run-single-test
upon compile-tests,run-single-test-only
There must be a good reason but I am surprised.
I did not remove the dependency...
There was a change last week (409) to make
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Peter,
I do not understand why you removed the dependency of run-single-test
upon compile-tests,run-single-test-only
There must be a good reason but I am surprised.
Antoine
peterreilly2004/02/23 06:14:36
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
allow ./build.sh test
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
peterreilly2004/01/13 04:32:16
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
stop corruption of .zip files in docs
PR: 25698
Obtained from: Jesse Glick
Revision ChangesPath
1.405 +8 -0 ant/build.xml
Index: build.xml
Cool, haven´t looked at that. But nice "introduction" in :-)
Jan
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: cvs commit: ant build.xml
>
>
> bodewig 2003/10/07 04:44:34
>
>
On Thu, 25 Sep 2003, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I was also wondering,why we had both optional.jar and its
> subcomponents.
When I split up optional.jar, I kept the original just to be sure we
had something to fall back to.
Having optional.jar and all the smaller pieces wou
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry, I had patched my build.xml but forgot to commit that change.
No problem at all.
I still use 1.3 in my default environment so I quickly found the
problem.
Stefan
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodewig 2003/09/23 06:14:41
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
AssertionsTest needs a javac that supports assert
sorry, I had patched my build.xml but forgot to commit that change.
-
To unsubscr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bodewig 2003/09/23 06:14:41
Modified:.build.xml
Log:
AssertionsTest needs a javac that supports assert
Revision ChangesPath
1.394 +1 -0 ant/build.xml
Index: build.xml
=
21 matches
Mail list logo
