Created as issue 36901 in bugzilla.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36901
PHiL
--- Phil Hourihane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oops. Sorry about that. Will do.
>
> PHiL
>
> --- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The changes listed below are contained in t
Oops. Sorry about that. Will do.
PHiL
--- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The changes listed below are contained in the
> patch
> > file. The other files are attached individually.
>
> This list strips attachments usually. Please open a
> BugZilla
> enhancement isntead, and at
Steve,
> I wonder if any of the CLASSPATH/Harmony java tests
> for property file parsing could be used here
I have a test class to accompany the submission. It
doesn't expand on the test class for the PropertyFile
task (which is, in fact, unchanged). Instead it puts
the new Properties subclass th
Phil Hourihane wrote:
Dominique,
I was pretty sure that Sun's stuff, although available
in source form, wasn't open-source per se, so I
avoided hacking their code. The class I have is
subclassed from Properties (to allow for polymorphic
substitution), and includes its own code for parsing
the in
See bottom of http://www.apache.org/licenses/ and
http://www.apache.org/licenses/software-grant.txt. --DD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dominique,
I was pretty sure that Sun's stuff, although available
in source form, wasn't open-source per se, so I
avoided hacking their code. The class I have is
subclassed from Properties (to allow for polymorphic
substitution), and includes its own code for parsing
the incoming file and handling
I agree with your analysis. Your enhanced PropertyFile task doesn't
fit the filterchain framework, although as Antoine rightly writes,
many other things do fit it and should be implemented or retrofitted
into that framework.
Regarding your submission per se, it really depends on how you coded
it.
vy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:03 AM
> > To: Ant Developers List
> > Subject: Re: enhancement for PropertyFile, have a
> > patch
> >
> > Hello Phil,
> > I wonder whether, instead of patching
> PropertyF
te:
> +1 - excellent proposal
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:03 AM
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Re: enhancement for PropertyFile, have a
> patch
>
> Hello Phil,
> I w
Hello Phil,
I wonder whether, instead of patching PropertyFile, you should not study
how the framework works and implement the functionalitiy
of propertyfile
as a filter. Then it should be possible to change the implementation of
propertyfile to make it use filters.
To my opinion, all tasks which
+1 - excellent proposal
-Original Message-
From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2005 10:03 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: Re: enhancement for PropertyFile, have a patch
Hello Phil,
I wonder whether, instead of patching PropertyFile, you
11 matches
Mail list logo