On Fri, 20 Jan 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Derby is mostly interesting as the syntax is (almost exactly) the
> same as DB2, so essentially you get to kill two birds with one stone
> (syntax tests wise anyway). Hope that translates to non-native
> English ant people :).
Germans
Not looked @ derby. DB-config/support in Smartfrog is on my lower
priority todo list for march, but I was going to focus on mysql
because its one we have a private component for that can just be
pulled into the public repository with the addition of an adequate set
of unit tests. If we did
At 06:28 2006-01-19, you wrote:
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the recent sql task bugs and realization that the tests are
awol, which databases could possibly be supported by Gump for
testing?
Just look over the project's built by Gump
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given the recent sql task bugs and realization that the tests are
awol, which databases could possibly be supported by Gump for
testing?
Just look over the project's built by Gump. hsqldb and derby are both
the
On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Kev Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given the recent sql task bugs and realization that the tests are
> awol, which databases could possibly be supported by Gump for
> testing?
Just look over the project's built by Gump. hsqldb and derby are both
there and would allow t
Hi all,
Given the recent sql task bugs and realization that the tests are awol,
which databases could possibly be supported by Gump for testing?
I'd imagine that there are both license and technical issues to deal
with regarding deploying multiple databases to test SQL task against
them. Co
