Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-16 Thread Sarika Sinha
Eclipse Bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=499717 Thanks & Regards, Sarika From: Sarika Sinha/India/IBM@IBMIN To: "Ant Developers List" Date: 01/17/2017 12:10 PM Subject: Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0 Code is available at http://git.eclipse.

Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-16 Thread Sarika Sinha
dev@ant.apache.org Date: 01/17/2017 11:58 AM Subject:Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0 This looks more related to how Eclipse (Ant?) plugin is doing that remote message processing for this feature of remote debugging the Ant build file. Without seeing the code related to that in the Eclipse pl

Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-16 Thread Jaikiran Pai
7;t know how Ant is playing Jaikiran Pai ---01/17/2017 11:34:47 AM---Looking at that stacktrace, I don't know how Ant is playing a role in any of it. Can you explain in From: Jaikiran Pai To: dev@ant.apache.org Date: 01/17/2017 11:34 AM Subject: Re: Facin

Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-16 Thread Sarika Sinha
cing Issues with Ant 1.10.0 Looking at that stacktrace, I don't know how Ant is playing a role in any of it. Can you explain in more detail what you mean by missing breakpoints and how it relates to that stacktrace? What code are you adding the breakpoints to? Also, that exception stacktrace doe

Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-16 Thread Jaikiran Pai
DE. From: Stefan Bodewig To: dev@ant.apache.org Date: 01/09/2017 09:22 PM Subject: Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0 On 2017-01-09, Sarika Sinha wrote: > I am trying to incorporate Ant 1.9.8 / 1.10.0 with Eclipse I

Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-16 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2017-01-17, Sarika Sinha wrote: > Thanks Stefan for the inputs, I could solve the other problems at Eclipse > IDE code level, By now we know we've broken classpath setup for Eclipse and will rectify that with a new release pretty soon (i.e. in weeks, not in month). https://bz.apache.org/bugzi

Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-16 Thread Sarika Sinha
: 01/09/2017 09:22 PM Subject: Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0 On 2017-01-09, Sarika Sinha wrote: > I am trying to incorporate Ant 1.9.8 / 1.10.0 with Eclipse IDE. > Has anyone faced a similar issue ? Or we already have some discussion on > the similar line ? > I could no

Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-09 Thread Dominique Devienne
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:52 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2017-01-09, Sarika Sinha wrote: > > > I am trying to incorporate Ant 1.9.8 / 1.10.0 with Eclipse IDE. [...] > > Where as 1.9.8 works fine with existing Ant framework in eclipse, having > > many issues with Ant 1.

Re: Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
porting such issues. I'm not an Eclipse user (or any IDE user) at all, so I won't be able to help much. > Where as 1.9.8 works fine with existing Ant framework in eclipse, having > many issues with Ant 1.10.0 like below and some more > - missing stack frames while debugging Ant wit

Facing Issues with Ant 1.10.0

2017-01-09 Thread Sarika Sinha
I am trying to incorporate Ant 1.9.8 / 1.10.0 with Eclipse IDE. Where as 1.9.8 works fine with existing Ant framework in eclipse, having many issues with Ant 1.10.0 like below and some more - missing stack frames while debugging Ant with breakpoints - Getting error while using Ant 1.1.0 and Java

issues with ant

2012-02-21 Thread lihua
hingsmall.com/]cheap burberry clothing[url/] -- View this message in context: http://ant.1045680.n5.nabble.com/issues-with-ant-tp5501076p5501076.html Sent from the Ant - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsu

Re: issues with ant

2010-11-11 Thread Jesse Glick
On 11/11/2010 03:35 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: javac should do what Ant does for it in the Java5 case. If the user only specifies -target but not -source, assume the user wanted the same version as well (and vice versa). Probably would be beneficial. I can file an issue for it in the Java bug

Re: issues with ant

2010-11-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-11-10, Jesse Glick wrote: > On 11/10/2010 12:17 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> this really is javac's fault > There's not really any good alternative policy for javac when the user > does not bother to specify a source level. Perhaps the -source and > -target parameters should have been man

Re: issues with ant

2010-11-10 Thread Jesse Glick
On 11/10/2010 12:17 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: The projects use a javac task like ... which is translated to a command line javac -target 1.5 ... This works fine with JDK6's javac but causes the error you've cited when run with OpenJDK 7. This is not the first time this happens,

Re: issues with ant

2010-11-09 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2010-11-09, Ludmila Shikhvarg wrote: > I've discovered some ant's problem during gump testing with jdk7 Thank you for reporting them. It might be a good idea to open bugzilla issues for them. > 1. The projects below failed to compile with jdk7 (1.7.0): > junit, test-junit ... > [javac] jav

issues with ant

2010-11-09 Thread Ludmila Shikhvarg
Hi, I've discovered some ant's problem during gump testing with jdk7 1. The projects below failed to compile with jdk7 (1.7.0): junit, test-junit hamcrest, hamcrest-java, hamcrest-java-unit-test, hamcrest-java-all args4j, args4j-tools, args4j-tests tomcat-tc6, javax.el, javax.servlet, javax.servl