Re: java 1.1 on linux

2003-03-20 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, peter reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1.5.1 and 1.5: java.lang.ClassFormatError: Bad major version number I do not get this on an admittedly simple build file using Blackdown's 1.1.8. I.e. Ant 1.5.1 from the binary tar.gz version seems to work with JDK 1.1 for me.

Re: java 1.1 on linux

2003-03-18 Thread Steve Loughran
Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, peter reilly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1.5.1 and 1.5: java.lang.ClassFormatError: Bad major version number I thought Magesh had carefully compiled everything with target=1.1 and so on. If this turns out to not work with JDK 1.1, it is another case for

Re: java 1.1 on linux

2003-03-18 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 05:17 am, Costin Manolache wrote: Ok - last week we had a proposal, discussions on ant-user and ant-dev, and apparently an almost general consensus. What's next ? Should we wait a bit more before making it official by a [VOTE], or just forget the whole thing ? I will

Re: java 1.1 on linux

2003-03-18 Thread Costin Manolache
Conor MacNeill wrote: On Wed, 19 Mar 2003 05:17 am, Costin Manolache wrote: Ok - last week we had a proposal, discussions on ant-user and ant-dev, and apparently an almost general consensus. What's next ? Should we wait a bit more before making it official by a [VOTE], or just forget the