Re: Can't find JUnit test runner on zOS 1.9?

On Thu, 3 Apr 2008, Jeffrey E. Care <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not expecting much help on this one, but it's worth a shot... I'm not expecting to be of much help either, sorry. The one thing that sticks out certainly is the size of the -classpath argument. Could there be a system limit (o

Can't find JUnit test runner on zOS 1.9?

I'm not expecting much help on this one, but it's worth a shot... I have a user complaining about junit test failures running on zOS 1.9. I've included what I think is the relevant portion of the log below; if anyone is willing/able to help but needs more info please let me kno

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43546] - JUnit Test Filtering, junit task extension

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43546] New: - JUnit Test Filtering, junit task extension

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43546 Summary: JUnit Test Filtering, junit task extension Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: Optional

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43004] - OutOfMemory caused by System.out when running simple JUnit test in .

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43004] - OutOfMemory caused by System.out when running simple JUnit test in .

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43004] - OutOfMemory caused by System.out when running simple JUnit test in .

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43004] - OutOfMemory caused by System.out when running simple JUnit test in .

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 43004] New: - OutOfMemory caused by System.out when running simple JUnit test in .

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43004 Summary: OutOfMemory caused by System.out when running simple JUnit test in . Product: Ant Version: 1.6.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Pr

Re: junit test

On 10/7/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Matt Benson wrote: > The current state of Ant's JUnit integration seems to > crash itself when running its own test. I haven't > looked into why, but it's adorable in an ironic sort > of way... > certainly tests are crashing the jvm on my wo

Re: junit test

Matt Benson wrote: The current state of Ant's JUnit integration seems to crash itself when running its own test. I haven't looked into why, but it's adorable in an ironic sort of way... certainly tests are crashing the jvm on my work box. Junit 3.8.1, Suse linux. its an IO test that takes do

Re: junit test

mixed mode) Regards, jan - Original Message - From: "Peter Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:08 PM Subject: Re: junit test I think that this is because junit4 is being used. Peter On 10/6/06, Matt Be

Re: junit test

From: "Peter Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" Sent: Friday, October 06, 2006 11:08 PM Subject: Re: junit test I think that this is because junit4 is being used. Peter On 10/6/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The current state of A

Re: junit test

I think that this is because junit4 is being used. Peter On 10/6/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The current state of Ant's JUnit integration seems to crash itself when running its own test. I haven't looked into why, but it's adorable in an ironic sort of way... -Matt __

junit test

The current state of Ant's JUnit integration seems to crash itself when running its own test. I haven't looked into why, but it's adorable in an ironic sort of way... -Matt __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection

Re: How to write a JUnit test for this new functionality?

Stephane Bailliez wrote: Steve Cohen wrote: However, my knowledge of Ant internals is somewhat limited. How can I tell an ant project in my test code that when it sees an tag, it should delegate the performance of this task to myRetryableFTP, instead of to the standard FTP as it would norma

Re: How to write a JUnit test for this new functionality?

Steve Cohen wrote: However, my knowledge of Ant internals is somewhat limited. How can I tell an ant project in my test code that when it sees an tag, it should delegate the performance of this task to myRetryableFTP, instead of to the standard FTP as it would normally do? Is there an exam

How to write a JUnit test for this new functionality?

re by subclassing the FTP task class (o.a.t.a.taskdefs.optional.net.FTP) within the JUnit test with a version that allows setting a numberOfFailuresToSimulate member, and a modified transferFiles() method that would, if numberOfFailuresToSimulate > 0, simply decrement this value by 1 and throw

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35073] - JUnit test runner outputs to stdout on failures, instead of relying on formatter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35073] New: - JUnit test runner outputs to stdout on failures, instead of relying on formatter

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35073 Summary: JUnit test runner outputs to stdout on failures, instead of relying on formatter Product: Ant Version: 1.6.4 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity:

RE: junit test runner enhancements

> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I think you cant see if a class is abstract without loading it (or using > BCEL). Load-time checking is best done in the runner, as the classpath > is all set up there. If you use BCEL (or better yet ASM since it's lighter weight and faster), y

Re: junit test runner enhancements

Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm thinking of what would it take to modify JUnitTestRunner to We have enhancement requests to do so in . It may be easier to write a selector. Stefan I think you cant see if a class is abstract without loading

Re: junit test runner enhancements

On Tue, 12 Apr 2005, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm thinking of what would it take to modify JUnitTestRunner to We have enhancement requests to do so in . It may be easier to write a selector. Stefan - To uns

Re: junit test runner enhancements

Phil Weighill Smith wrote: Steve, I've not written any code to help here, but thought the following issue could also be considered: When executing a test class that has no test methods what-so-ever (e.g. someone comments out all tests for some reason) the runner currently barfs instead of ignoring

Re: junit test runner enhancements

Steve, I've not written any code to help here, but thought the following issue could also be considered: When executing a test class that has no test methods what-so-ever (e.g. someone comments out all tests for some reason) the runner currently barfs instead of ignoring the test class. Phil :n.

junit test runner enhancements

I'm thinking of what would it take to modify JUnitTestRunner to -skip anything that is abstract -skip anything that is not a test case I know there are bugs on this; has anyone done the code to do it, and if not, where should I start. I could tweak JUnitTestRunner.run() to probe classes and then

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29407] - Handle null JUnit test name more gracefully

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29407] - Handle null JUnit test name more gracefully

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29407] New: - Handle null JUnit test name more gracefully

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29407 Handle null JUnit test name more gracefully Summary: Handle null JUnit test name more gracefully Product: Ant Version: 1.6.1 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: Enhancement Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24928] - Multithreaded JUnit test cases with Log4J and ANT

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24928 Multithreaded JUnit test cases with Log4J and ANT [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24928] - Multithreaded JUnit test cases with Log4J and ANT

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24928 Multithreaded JUnit test cases with Log4J and ANT --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2003-11-26 12:59 --- Ant attaches threads and their outputs to tasks to enable tasks running in to log without interfering with each other. If you spawn a new threa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24928] New: - Multithreaded JUnit test cases with Log4J and ANT

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24928 Multithreaded JUnit test cases with Log4J and ANT Summary: Multithreaded JUnit test cases with Log4J and ANT Product: Ant Version: 1.5.4 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows NT/2K Status: NEW Severity: