On 2014-01-06, Jesse Glick wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> all Ant sees is a plain IOException so we cannot handle the case by
>> falling back to stream based copying.
> Why not? Even if the IOException is “genuine” (missing permissions,
> etc.), a fallback to
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> all Ant sees is a plain IOException so we cannot handle the case by falling
> back to stream based copying.
Why not? Even if the IOException is “genuine” (missing permissions,
etc.), a fallback to stream copying would presumably fail with
Le 4 janv. 2014 à 16:23, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> in ResourceUtils#copy we'll use FileChannel#transferFrom if source and
> target are Files and we don't need to modify the contents. It looks as
> if transferFrom uses mmap under the covers and sometimes fails to do so
> - for exam
Hi all,
in ResourceUtils#copy we'll use FileChannel#transferFrom if source and
target are Files and we don't need to modify the contents. It looks as
if transferFrom uses mmap under the covers and sometimes fails to do so
- for example when one file is on a network file system[1] but it looks
as