[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2296?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chinmay Kolhatkar reassigned APEXMALHAR-2296:
-
Assignee: (was: Chinmay Kolhatkar)
> Apex SQL: Add support for S
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2295?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chinmay Kolhatkar reassigned APEXMALHAR-2295:
-
Assignee: (was: Chinmay Kolhatkar)
> Apex SQL: Replace POJOInner
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chinmay Kolhatkar reassigned APEXMALHAR-2294:
-
Assignee: (was: Chinmay Kolhatkar)
> Apex SQL: Make operator nam
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chinmay Kolhatkar reassigned APEXMALHAR-2293:
-
Assignee: (was: Chinmay Kolhatkar)
> Apex SQL: Add sql line cli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chinmay Kolhatkar reassigned APEXMALHAR-2292:
-
Assignee: (was: Chinmay Kolhatkar)
> Apex SQL: Add generic endpo
+1 this should be tracked in a JIRA.
There are also some improvements that can be done to the instructions on
the docker hub (separate activity).
I would also suggest to list the Apex binary build on the downloads page
for users that have an existing cluster:
https://github.com/atrato/apex-cli-p
It is exactly the same use case with the exception that it is not
necessary to write data to files. Consider 3 operators, an input
operator, an aggregate operator and an output operator. When the
application starts, the output port of the aggregate operator should be
in the closed state, the st
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15960003#comment-15960003
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2476:
GitHub user yogidevendra ope
GitHub user yogidevendra opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/603
APEXMALHAR-2476-Fix-tupleSeperator-override.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/yogidevendra/apex-malhar
APEXMALHAR-2476
GitHub user prasannapramod opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/602
Inserted "threshold" log property in Log4j.properties file.
Fixed log4j properties.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oliver Winke reassigned APEXMALHAR-2475:
Assignee: Oliver Winke
> CacheStore needn't expire data if it read-only data
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2473?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oliver Winke reassigned APEXMALHAR-2473:
Assignee: Oliver Winke
> Support for global cache meta information in db Cache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2474?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Oliver Winke reassigned APEXMALHAR-2474:
Assignee: Oliver Winke
> FSLoader only returns value at the beginning
> --
All,
In the Sandbox section of the Apache Apex Development Environment Setup
documentation (
https://apex.apache.org/docs/apex/apex_development_setup/#sandbox),
instructions are provided for a vendor-specific Sandbox.
I would like to propose that these instructions be changed to reference the
Apa
You would need to provide more specifics of the use case you are thinking
to address to make this a meaningful discussion.
An example for APEXCORE-408 (based on real batch use case): I have two
stages, first stage produces a set of files that second stage needs as
input. Stage 1 operators to be re
It is not about a use case difference. My proposal and APEXCORE-408
address the same use case - how to re-allocate resources for batch
applications or applications where processing happens in stages. The
difference between APEXCORE-408 and the proposal is shift in complexity
from application lo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15958879#comment-15958879
]
Tushar Gosavi commented on APEXCORE-408:
[~thw] I have opened a pull request
ht
17 matches
Mail list logo