+1
1) Verified the file Integrity check.
2) Verified the source code using tar file.
- Extracted tar file and compiled.
- No binary files
- LICENSE, NOTICE, README, CHANGELOG.md exist.
- rat check
3) Launched PI demo.
Regards,
Chaitanya
On Wed, May 3, 2017 at 7:07 AM, Pramod Imma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2278?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15995704#comment-15995704
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2278:
Github user asfgit closed th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/486
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
The Australia/Pacific version of Dataworks Summit is in Sydney this year,
September 20-21. This is a great place to talk about work you are doing in
Apache Apex or how you are using Apex. Information on submitting an abstract
is at https://dataworkssummit.com/sydney-2017/abstracts/submit-abst
GitHub user tweise opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-site/pull/74
fixes to release instructions
@tushargosavi review
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/tweise/apex-site release-instructions
Altern
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise updated APEXCORE-234:
--
Summary: Better application configuration specification (was: Investigate
other ways to speci
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-233?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise updated APEXCORE-233:
--
Labels: (was: roadmap)
> Ability to specify single instance objects in configuration
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-234?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15995261#comment-15995261
]
Thomas Weise commented on APEXCORE-234:
---
I think that the current approach of sett
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise updated APEXCORE-163:
--
Labels: (was: roadmap)
> Dynamic application property changes
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15995051#comment-15995051
]
Thomas Weise commented on APEXMALHAR-2162:
--
Maybe this helps:
http://apache-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2162?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15994997#comment-15994997
]
Thomas Weise commented on APEXMALHAR-2162:
--
It should be possible to adjust
GitHub user amberarrow reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/597
Apexmalhar 2274.merge pr490
This is just #490 with merge conflicts resolved.
It looks good to me, so I'll merge it in a day or two unless I hear any
additional requests for change.
Github user amberarrow closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/apex-malhar/pull/597
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
The main difference is in the implementations of managed state that are
used in the two join impls.
The advantage mainly comes from the fact that Join impl 1 uses
ManagedTimeStateImpl (key buckets + time buckets) while Join impl 2 is
based on the other two implementations (both with the notion of e
14 matches
Mail list logo
