Re: Input needed for ApexCli.

2017-08-05 Thread Mohit Jotwani
+1 for best efforts with warning logs. Regards, Mohit Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 6, 2017, at 12:42 AM, Vlad Rozov wrote: > > I don't see need for the flag either. The output of the command should be > what applications were stopped/shutdown and which one were not (for any > reason). > >

Re: Improvement suggestions for AbstractRabbitMQInputOperator

2017-06-12 Thread Mohit Jotwani
ange and exchange Type as specified specified. * > > > > *Setup:* > > > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setQueueName("test"); > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setExchangeType("fanout"); > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setExchange("new_exchange"); > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setRoutingKey("test"); > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setHost("localhost"); > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setPort(5672); > > *Result:* > > Worked with no issues. But it demands that it durable queue has to be > > created with proper exchange and routing key > > > > *4) Queuename not specified in an app but exchange and exchangeType > > specified for Operator * > > > > *Setup:* > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setExchangeType("fanout"); > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setExchange("new_exchange"); > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setHost("localhost"); > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setRoutingKey("test"); > > rabbitMQInputOperator.setPort(5672); > > > > *Result:* > > Operator ended up creating queue with unique names such as > > “amq.gen-dHDsywLO-8eV8qZM4Q4T_w” which gets auto deleted when last > > consumer stops consuming from it. > > > > > > Thanks & Regards, > > Vikram > > > -- Regards, ___ *Mohit Jotwani* Product Manager E: mo...@datatorrent.com | M: +91 97699 62740 www.datatorrent.com | apex.apache.org

Re: Proposal to upgrade Apex Core dependency in Malhar to 3.6

2017-05-12 Thread Mohit Jotwani
ds on core 3.4. Custom tuple support has > > been > > > > added to core in 3.6. Hence, malhar dependency needs to be updated. > > > > This is necessary for changing the malhar operators for batch use > > cases. > > > > > > > > Let

Re: Schema Discovery Support in Apex Applications

2017-01-17 Thread Mohit Jotwani
+1 Regards, Mohit On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Bhupesh Chawda wrote: > +1 for the feature. > > ~ Bhupesh > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar > wrote: > > > Those are not really anonymous POJOs... The definition of POJO will be > > known to user as based on that only ups

Re: "ExcludeNodes" for an Apex application

2016-12-01 Thread Mohit Jotwani
I would agree with Milind. Regards, Mohit On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:49 PM, Milind Barve wrote: > Additionally, this would apply to Stram as well i.e. the master should also > not be deployed on these nodes. Not sure if anti-affinity goes beyond > operators. > > On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 12:47 PM,

Re: "ExcludeNodes" for an Apex application

2016-11-30 Thread Mohit Jotwani
This is a practical scenario where developers would be required to exclude certain nodes as they might be required for some mission critical applications. It would be good to have this feature. I understand that Stram should not get into resourcing and still rely on Yarn, however, as the App Maste

Re: APEXMALHAR-2354 Heuristic Watermark in windowed operator

2016-11-29 Thread Mohit Jotwani
+1 for David's approach Regards, Mohit On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:17 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar wrote: > David, > > Your suggestion make sense. This will also help in the idempotency. > I'll also change the name of interface to WatermarkGenerator. > > I had 2 more questions here: > 1. AbstractWindo

Re: Apex internal documentation.

2016-11-29 Thread Mohit Jotwani
+1 Regards, Mohit On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:30 PM, Aniruddha Thombare < anirud...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > +1 > I would also request graphical representation for ease of understanding. > I could not find any illustrations about Apex internals. > If someone knows, please point me to it. > If it

Re: Adding new log4j appender to Apex core

2016-11-23 Thread Mohit Jotwani
+1 - Approach 2 Regards, Mohit On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:35 PM, AJAY GUPTA wrote: > +1 for approach 2. > > > Regards, > Ajay > > On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 12:16 PM, David Yan wrote: > > > The goal of this log4j appender is to provide a log offset and the fixed > > name of the container log file

Re: Visitor API for DAG

2016-11-17 Thread Mohit Jotwani
+1 Regards, Mohit On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Tushar Gosavi wrote: > Hi All, > > How about adding visitor like API for DAG in Apex, and an api to > register visitor for the DAG. > Possible use cases are > - Validator visitor which could validate the dag > - Visitor to inject properties/

Re: Integration with Apache Samoa

2016-11-07 Thread Mohit Jotwani
Finally! Congratulations!! Very well done Regards, Mohit On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Bhupesh Chawda wrote: > Hi All, > > The PR for making Apex a runner for SAMOA has been merged. > > Apache SAMOA now has an additional runner with Apache Apex - > https://github.com/apache/incubator-sam

Re: S3 Output Module

2016-10-27 Thread Mohit Jotwani
+1 for Solution 2 Regards, Mohit On 27 Oct 2016 2:02 p.m., "Sandeep Deshmukh" wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > Sandeep > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 1:53 PM, Chaitanya Chebolu < > chaita...@datatorrent.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I am planning to implement the approach (2) of S3 Output Module wh

Re: Malhar release 3.6

2016-10-27 Thread Mohit Jotwani
+1 Regards, Mohit On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:17 AM, Sandesh Hegde wrote: > Here is a one more jira for 3.6, I need few more days to open the PR. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2298?filter=-1 > > Thanks > > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 10:28 AM Vlad Rozov > wrote: > > +1. It wil

Re: Kudu store operators

2016-10-03 Thread Mohit Jotwani
+1 Regards, Mohit On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Chaitanya Chebolu wrote: > +1 > > Regards, > Chaitanya > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 6:01 PM, Sanjay Pujare > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > On Oct 3, 2016 5:33 PM, "Sandeep Deshmukh" > > wrote: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > Regards, > > > Sandeep > > > > >

Re: Apex website update proposal

2016-08-10 Thread Mohit Jotwani
Hi Kartavya, This is a good initiative. +1 Regards, Mohit On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Kartavya Jain wrote: > Hi Pramod, > > +1 for "Initiatives". And yes, I would appreciate some help to make these > changes on the website. > > Thanks, > Kartavya > > On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 4:48 PM, Pramo

Re: APEXMALHAR-1701 Deduper in Malhar

2016-07-18 Thread Mohit Jotwani
Dear Community, +1 to Bhupesh's suggestion. I would suggest to go ahead with the Managed State and once we have proper analysis on the windowed operator + large storage backed windowed operator - we should implement operators such as dedup with it. Regards, Mohit On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:35 P