On 2017-09-01 10:36, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> Wouldn't you need to call a separate procedural vote for whether changes
> cannot be allowed into 3.x without requiring they be submitted to 4.x as
> there was a disagreement there? Also, I am not sure that the procedural
> vote argumen
On 2017-09-01 08:54, Thomas Weise wrote:
> There wasn't any more discussion on this, so here is the result:
>
> 1. Version 4.0 as major version change from 3.x
>
>
> +1 (7)
>
> Thomas Weise (PMC)
> Ananth G
> Vlad Rozov (PMC)
> Munagala Ramanath (committe
