Thanks for your input Justin.
We did use JOOQ runtime only.
-Priyanka
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Justin Mclean
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A little late here but form a quick look it should be OK.
>
> The jOOQ runtime (which I assume is the bit you want to use) is Apache
> licensed and what it depe
Hi,
A little late here but form a quick look it should be OK.
The jOOQ runtime (which I assume is the bit you want to use) is Apache licensed
and what it depends is compatible.
You could not bundle the jOOQ-meta-extensions in source or binary release as it
depends on Category B license (MPL) w
Hi,
Does anyone has inputs on licensing part? I will start a new mail thread to
discuss that issue separately.
-Priyanka
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:58 PM, Pradeep A. Dalvi wrote:
> +1 From what I read, this change is completely backword compatible.
>
> --prad
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:13
+1 From what I read, this change is completely backword compatible.
--prad
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar wrote:
> Yes there is no clash with calcite integration. Calcite is a query planner
> converts SQL to a relational algebra... This is different.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 201
Yes there is no clash with calcite integration. Calcite is a query planner
converts SQL to a relational algebra... This is different.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 11:03 AM, Priyanka Gugale wrote:
> I don't know much about Calcite, but reading abstract, calcite seems to be
> for different purpose. Wha
I don't know much about Calcite, but reading abstract, calcite seems to be
for different purpose. What I want to achieve here is some library which
will let me construct sql query without worrying about different DB
platforms. The library will take care of converting query to the DB
specific syntax
But is it a duplication of integration with Calcite?
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Timothy Farkas <
timothytiborfar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I see, cool :)
>
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Priyanka Gugale
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > We are not creating our own DSL, the jooq is just anoth
I see, cool :)
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:21 AM, Priyanka Gugale wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> We are not creating our own DSL, the jooq is just another query
> parser/builder like JsqlParser. I am trying to use one of these query DSL
> libraries to replace the existing code in operator which is written t
Hi Tim,
We are not creating our own DSL, the jooq is just another query
parser/builder like JsqlParser. I am trying to use one of these query DSL
libraries to replace the existing code in operator which is written to
construct the queries.
-Priyanka
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:42 PM, Timothy Farka
I don't know the exact context here so please forgive me if I'm mistaken. I
don't think creating our own DSL is the way to go. Creating a generic DSL
is hard. We should support setting the flavor of SQL being used as a
property and then allow standard sql to be specified. There are already
mature A
Looking closely at licensing, it says it *depends but doesn't bundle* those
non ASL license dependencies. As per my understanding those will be
included only if we explicitly include them using our application pom.
Right away we are not using any of those features which depend of such
third party l
+1 for using DSL constructs that are vendor agnostic.
Checkout https://github.com/querydsl/querydsl (Apache licensed) as well
in-case it fits better in terms of implementation.
Also, once the DSL work is done, please test and document the behavior
(exactly once, at-least once ..)the operator has
It is a good idea to get rid of vendor specific implementation differences
for SQL.
However, the licensing does not seem to be straightforward. Please check:
http://www.jooq.org/legal/licensing. Can this be used as a dependency in
Apex?
~ Bhupesh
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Priyanka Gugale
Hi,
Malhar JDBC operator does lots of string manipulation and other handling to
construct sql queries as per user inputs. Instead of constructing queries
on our own we should use some dsl api library which will let us write DB
agnostic code and take care of all other complexities.
I am trying out
14 matches
Mail list logo
