That's good in that it might give you some material for a PODLINGNAMESEARCH
JIRA.
However, DataTorrent's name search doesn't really mean much now that Apex is
incubating at the ASF.
I would recommend following the standard procedure of filing a name search JIRA.
-Taylor
> On Oct 8, 2015, at
GitHub user vrozov opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/110
APEX-184
Suspend DataListIterator and release block reference in case LogicalNode is
not ready to send data to downstream operator. Do not enable read in
resumeReadIfSuspended when not
Hi,
> I'm not sure how common it is for the groupId not matching the Java package
> names, but most of the artifacts i have seen have matching names.
While not common I know of several projects where they don’t match.
Thanks,
Justin
If we change the groupId and the artifactId, but retain the Java package
names, the only thing existing users need to change is the pom file.
I'm not sure how common it is for the groupId not matching the Java package
names, but most of the artifacts i have seen have matching names.
David
On Fri
Github user tweise commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/106#issuecomment-146992337
Made the script change.
+1 for attention to APEX-137 :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user tushargosavi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/22#discussion_r41665429
--- Diff:
contrib/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/contrib/schema/parser/JsonParser.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,106 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to th
Github user tushargosavi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/22#discussion_r41665402
--- Diff:
contrib/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/contrib/schema/formatter/XmlFormatter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed
Github user tushargosavi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/22#discussion_r41665412
--- Diff:
contrib/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/contrib/schema/parser/CsvParser.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the
Github user tushargosavi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/22#discussion_r41665388
--- Diff:
contrib/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/contrib/schema/formatter/JsonFormatter.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+/**
+ * License
Github user vrozov commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/106#issuecomment-146953867
Personally I don't mind few seconds extra time for checkstyle and license
check during main development lifecycle as test consumes most of the time and I
do
We can't add alternative dependencies in dtIngest.
Ideally AMQ client should be able to connect to other JMS servers. If I am
missing something and adding alternative provider is required, we can take
it up in next release.
-Priyanka
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Thomas Weise wrote:
> Can you
Github user tweise commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/106#issuecomment-146938410
@chandnisingh This change is about what runs in Travis CI. The license
header check does not run in the development environment unless you do the
-Dlicense.
Quite simple use case; subscribe to JMS topic and archive message in Hadoop for
later analysis.
How do you add the JMS implementation provider Jar files? Do I need to add them
to DT classpath configuration?
Apology for simple query since I am new to DT/Apex.
> On 9 Oct 2015, at 6:39 pm, Pri
Thanks for your prompt response. I was following the doc instruction but could
not find the configuration dialog using the Sandbox image version.
> On 9 Oct 2015, at 6:44 pm, Akshay Gore wrote:
>
> +Apex dev
>
> Thanks,
> Akshay
>
>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Akshay Gore wrote:
>>
Can you please outline how the alternative JMS provider dependencies should
be added (when not using AMQ)?
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:54 AM, Priyanka Gugale
wrote:
> We are shipping activeMQ client jar with dtIngest. You should be able to
> have any JMS server and dtIngest should read messages fro
Thanks Hitesh, this actually answers another question I was about to ask :-)
We have to make a choice for the upcoming 3.2.0-incubating release. If we
want to use the ASF maven repo, then groupId and artifactId would need to
be changed. The groupId is currently still com.datatorrent, it needs to g
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/54
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the f
The same holds for publishing artifacts to the maven repo. You publish version
2.5.0-incubating ( to clarify, if you are using version 2.5.0 in the poms, it
should be changed to “2.5.0-incubating” ) and if the RC vote succeeds, then
these get promoted ( or dropped on a vote failure ).
thanks
—
We are shipping activeMQ client jar with dtIngest. You should be able to
have any JMS server and dtIngest should read messages from that. If you
face any issues please let us know.
-Priyanka
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Eric Asuncion wrote:
> Quite simple use case; subscribe to JMS topic and
+Apex dev
Thanks,
Akshay
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Akshay Gore wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Yes, we bundle dtingest with DT RTS Sandbox. The download link with
> details is available at below location:
>
> https://www.datatorrent.com/download/#
>
> Thanks,
> Akshay
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:
Hi Eric,
Can you elaborate on your use case?
We have JMS input operator. And we also have dtIngest application which is
free to use (not open sourced though). Once configured for JMS input,
dtIngest will read JMS message and sent it to some file based destination
or other messaging systems like k
Hi,
> Otherwise the package is rebuilt without RC in the archive name.
Normally the package is renamed not rebuilt.
> But since the package is rebuilt, what finally goes out isn't really what
> was voted on.
If you just rename it then it is the artefact you voted on. Part of the release
proces
22 matches
Mail list logo
