Hi,
Would this help?
http://johnzon.incubator.apache.org
Justin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sandeep Deshmukh closed APEXMALHAR-2010.
Resolution: Done
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
> Add transform operator
> ---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/209
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207950#comment-15207950
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2010:
Github user asfgit closed th
+1
This would be a good value add.
It will result in achieving higher throughput for input operators which needs
to consume selective json fields.
Thx,
Ashish
> On 23-Mar-2016, at 10:31 AM, Bhupesh Chawda wrote:
>
> A multi-line JSON format is very common and is usually the case with REST
>
Right now it's not for output operator, but one can very well use bandwidth
manager to keep track of bandwidth usage and limit your output speed. The
bigger challenge there would be, you won't be able to process window data
sent by upstream operator in same window. For that you need to do more than
That's a good question Chaitanya, Right now the bandwidth control is at
Input Operator level and not application level. So if you have two input
operator you need to set bandwidth on both separately by this design.
May be it would be good to have bandwidth control at Application level than
operator
Priyanka,
>From the design description it is not clear how it will be used to control
output bandwidth (point #2,3,4 mentioned by Sandeep)
~ Yogi
On 23 March 2016 at 11:39, Chaitanya Chebolu
wrote:
> This is very useful feature.
> I would like to know, how you are distributing the bandwidth fo
This is very useful feature.
I would like to know, how you are distributing the bandwidth for the below
situation:
- Two input operators say i1 and i2 are deployed on same node and both the
operators have bandwidthManager as plugin.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 5:43 PM, Priyanka Gugale
wrote:
> Hi,
>
+1
-Priyanka
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:09 AM, Akshay Gore
wrote:
> +1
>
> Looking forward Apex as Apache TLP.
>
> -Akshay
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Shubham Pathak
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shubham
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Yogi Devendra >
> > wrote:
>
+1
Looking forward Apex as Apache TLP.
-Akshay
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Shubham Pathak
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks,
> Shubham
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Yogi Devendra
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> >
> > ~ Yogi
> >
> > On 23 March 2016 at 10:20, Chaitanya Chebolu
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
Hi,
Since we have a lot of support for this I will create a ticket.
Thanks,
Chandni
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Shubham Pathak
wrote:
> +1 to have it as a separate class.
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Chaitanya Chebolu <
> chaita...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
>
> > +1. Move it out fr
Sure I'll pick it up.
Thanks,
Tim
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:17 PM, Pramod Immaneni
wrote:
> Do you want to dig into the issue Tim?
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Timothy Farkas
> wrote:
>
> > This is a platform bug I encountered as well. I reported it a while ago.
> >
> > https://issues.
Chandni Singh created APEXCORE-404:
--
Summary: Move FileLineInputOperator out of
AbstractFileInputOperator
Key: APEXCORE-404
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-404
Project: Apache Ape
+1
Thanks,
Shubham
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Yogi Devendra
wrote:
> +1
>
>
> ~ Yogi
>
> On 23 March 2016 at 10:20, Chaitanya Chebolu
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:19 AM, HARSH PATHAK
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > > On 23-Mar-2016 10:09 am, "Pradeep Kumbhar"
> > >
+1
~ Yogi
On 23 March 2016 at 10:20, Chaitanya Chebolu
wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:19 AM, HARSH PATHAK
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> > On 23-Mar-2016 10:09 am, "Pradeep Kumbhar"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Vlad Rozov
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2017?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207881#comment-15207881
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2017:
Github user chandnisingh com
Github user chandnisingh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/218#discussion_r57111096
--- Diff:
library/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/lib/io/fs/AbstractFileOutputOperator.java
---
@@ -1195,6 +1188,24 @@ public void close()
A multi-line JSON format is very common and is usually the case with REST
API results.
I think this could be a valuable addition.
Regarding the issues that you mentioned, I think it can be solved by having
a custom file splitter which takes care of splitting on a JSON record
boundary.
+1 for a st
+1
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:19 AM, HARSH PATHAK
wrote:
> +1
> On 23-Mar-2016 10:09 am, "Pradeep Kumbhar"
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Vlad Rozov
> > wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > >
> > > Vlad
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/22/16 12:09, Amol Ke
+1
On 23-Mar-2016 10:09 am, "Pradeep Kumbhar" wrote:
> +1
>
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Vlad Rozov
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Vlad
> >
> >
> > On 3/22/16 12:09, Amol Kekre wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Thks
> >> Amol
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016
+1
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Vlad Rozov wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thank you,
>
> Vlad
>
>
> On 3/22/16 12:09, Amol Kekre wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Thks
>> Amol
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Pramod Immaneni
>> wrote:
>>
>> Dear Community,
>>>
>>> Based on the positive di
Do you want to dig into the issue Tim?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:53 PM, Timothy Farkas wrote:
> This is a platform bug I encountered as well. I reported it a while ago.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-316
>
> I believe the root cause is that when you set the stream codec on a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2015?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207845#comment-15207845
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2015:
Github user pradeepdalvi com
Github user pradeepdalvi commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/217#discussion_r57107850
--- Diff:
library/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/lib/projection/ProjectionOperator.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,303 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to
This is a platform bug I encountered as well. I reported it a while ago.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-316
I believe the root cause is that when you set the stream codec on a stream
the default is only replaced for the downstream or upstream, but the
default stream codec continue
You don't need to override the stream codec unless you want a different
serialization or partitioning than what the default provides. The default
codec uses Kryo for serialization and hashCode() for partitioning.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:20 PM, Pramod Immaneni
wrote:
> Venkatesh,
>
> Any speci
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chandni Singh resolved APEXCORE-392.
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce
> Stack Overflow when launching jobs
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chandni Singh closed APEXCORE-392.
--
> Stack Overflow when launching jobs
> --
>
> Key:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise resolved APEXCORE-393.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Reset failure count when consecutive failed node is removed from blackli
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise updated APEXCORE-393:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
> Reset failure count when consecutive failed node is removed from blackl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207699#comment-15207699
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-393:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull re
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/274
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
+1 (binding)
Thank you,
Vlad
On 3/22/16 12:09, Amol Kekre wrote:
+1 (binding)
Thks
Amol
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
Dear Community,
Based on the positive discussion, I'm calling for the community VOTE
to graduate Apache Apex (incubating) to top level project
Would love the community's input on this idea and thoughts on technical
challenges we may run into when implementing this within Apex.
Sent with Good (www.good.com)
From: Herger, Brendan
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 7:49:51 PM
To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207624#comment-15207624
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-1897:
Github user chandnisingh com
Github user chandnisingh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/145#discussion_r57094062
--- Diff:
library/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/lib/state/managed/ManagedTimeStateImpl.java
---
@@ -51,63 +51,57 @@ public void put(long
GitHub user davidyan74 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/284
Testing DelayOperator unit test with travis, DO NOT merge
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/davidyan74/incubator
Github user davidyan74 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/284
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
GitHub user davidyan74 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/284
Testing DelayOperator unit test with travis, DO NOT merge
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/davidyan74/incubator-a
David Yan created APEXCORE-403:
--
Summary: DelayOperato unit test fails intermittently
Key: APEXCORE-403
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-403
Project: Apache Apex Core
Issue Ty
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Yan resolved APEXCORE-397.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.3.1
3.4.0
> Allow configurability of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207597#comment-15207597
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-397:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull re
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/277
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207563#comment-15207563
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-393:
-
Github user ishark commented on a dif
Github user ishark commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/274#discussion_r57090295
--- Diff:
engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/StreamingAppMasterService.java ---
@@ -950,7 +977,11 @@ private void execute() throws YarnExc
Hi All,
Starting this thread to get opinions for adding a streaming JSON parser for
converting a JSON to POJO.This parser would be in addition to the databind
parser (com.fasterxml.jackson.databind) we already have.
The advantage of a streaming JSON parser is,
1.The parser need not parse entire
Hey all,
I and the Data Innovation Lab team at Capital One (including Ilya Ganelin,
Brennon York, Dongming Liang and Rikin Shah) would like to propose the
DataFrame for Apache Apex.
We feel that a DataFrame object would solve Apex’s need for a standardized
internal data format (schema aware o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207541#comment-15207541
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-393:
-
Github user tweise commented on the p
Github user tweise commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/274#issuecomment-200081121
@ishark this looks good!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
+ 1
~Dev
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ashish Tadose
wrote:
> + 1
>
> Thanks,
> Ashish
>
> > On 23-Mar-2016, at 3:19 AM, Bright Chen wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks
> > Bright
> >
> >> On Mar 22, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Sairam Kannan
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >> On Mar 22, 2016 2:09 PM, "Ashwin
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/283
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207530#comment-15207530
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-393:
-
Github user tweise commented on a dif
Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/274#discussion_r57088465
--- Diff:
engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/StreamingAppMasterService.java ---
@@ -950,7 +977,11 @@ private void execute() throws YarnExc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-393?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207511#comment-15207511
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-393:
-
Github user tweise commented on a dif
Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/274#discussion_r57087518
--- Diff:
engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/StreamingAppMasterService.java ---
@@ -781,18 +794,19 @@ private void execute() throws YarnEx
GitHub user trusli opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/283
Update security.md
Corrected some typo and rewrote one sentence.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/trusli/incubator-ape
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207508#comment-15207508
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-1897:
Github user amberarrow comme
Venkatesh,
Any specific reason you replaced the default stream codec with
KryoSerializableStreamCodec?
Also what apex version are you using?
Thanks
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 4:16 PM, Kottapalli, Venkatesh <
vkottapa...@directv.com> wrote:
> Yes Ashwin, It has the default constructor as below.
>
>
Github user amberarrow commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/145#discussion_r57086936
--- Diff:
library/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/lib/state/managed/ManagedTimeStateImpl.java
---
@@ -51,63 +51,57 @@ public void put(long b
Yes Ashwin, It has the default constructor as below.
public Results() {
super();
}
-Venkatesh.
-Original Message-
From: Ashwin Chandra Putta [mailto:ashwinchand...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 4:07 PM
To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Reg IndexOutOfBound
For any class to be serializable by kryo, it needs to have the default no
arg constructor.
Regards,
Ashwin.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Kottapalli, Venkatesh <
vkottapa...@directv.com> wrote:
> Yes Ashwin, I know the details of the class. It is a new class that I have
> added to the project
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207477#comment-15207477
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-397:
-
Github user davidyan74 commented on a
Github user davidyan74 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/277#discussion_r57084367
--- Diff:
engine/src/test/java/com/datatorrent/stram/util/SecurityUtilsTest.java ---
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Yes Ashwin, I know the details of the class. It is a new class that I have
added to the project. Do I have check that for anything specific that might
cause this issue?
-Venkatesh.
-Original Message-
From: Ashwin Chandra Putta [mailto:ashwinchand...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207466#comment-15207466
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-1897:
Github user amberarrow comme
Github user amberarrow commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/145#discussion_r57083270
--- Diff:
library/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/lib/state/managed/ManagedTimeStateImpl.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/**
+ * License
+ 1
Thanks,
Ashish
> On 23-Mar-2016, at 3:19 AM, Bright Chen wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Thanks
> Bright
>
>> On Mar 22, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Sairam Kannan wrote:
>>
>> +1
>> On Mar 22, 2016 2:09 PM, "Ashwin Chandra Putta"
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ashwin.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 22, 201
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1897?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207439#comment-15207439
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-1897:
Github user chandnisingh com
Github user chandnisingh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/145#discussion_r57081100
--- Diff:
library/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/lib/state/managed/ManagedTimeStateImpl.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/**
+ * Licen
Venkatesh,
Do you know the name of the class it is not finding? Is it any new
dependency you added to the project?
Regards,
Ashwin.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Kottapalli, Venkatesh <
vkottapa...@directv.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I ran into the below issues while running the ap
Yes, committers carry over.
-Taylor
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 2:47 PM, Thomas Weise wrote:
>
> My understanding is committers are automatically carried over. Can mentors
> please confirm?
>
>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
>>
>> Do the committers retain their committer
Hi,
I ran into the below issues while running the app today. Any
inputs on why this is happening? I see this JIRA raised already but closed as
"Not reproducible".
https://malhar.atlassian.net/browse/MLHR-1709
Stopped running due to an exception.
java.lang.IndexOutOf
+1
Thanks
Bright
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Sairam Kannan wrote:
>
> +1
> On Mar 22, 2016 2:09 PM, "Ashwin Chandra Putta"
> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ashwin.
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
>> chin...@datatorrent.com
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> Re
+1 [binding]
Sent with Good (www.good.com)
From: Sairam Kannan
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2016 3:13:16 PM
To: dev@apex.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apex from the Incubator
+1
On Mar 22, 2016 2:09 PM, "Ashwin Chandra Putta"
wrote:
> +1
>
> R
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207364#comment-15207364
]
Chandni Singh edited comment on APEXCORE-392 at 3/22/16 9:37 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207364#comment-15207364
]
Chandni Singh commented on APEXCORE-392:
[~ilganeli] I highly suspect that it ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Yan resolved APEXCORE-326.
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Bhupesh Chawda (was: David Yan)
Fix Version/s: 3.3.1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207346#comment-15207346
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-326:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull re
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/282
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207343#comment-15207343
]
Ilya Ganelin commented on APEXCORE-392:
---
[~csingh] The issue is not due to incompa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207297#comment-15207297
]
Chandni Singh commented on APEXCORE-392:
The bug cannot be reproduced and seems
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207285#comment-15207285
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-397:
-
Github user davidyan74 commented on a
Github user davidyan74 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/277#discussion_r57067551
--- Diff: api/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/api/Context.java ---
@@ -101,6 +101,20 @@
String getJVMOptions(List operatorMetaList);
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chandni Singh updated APEXCORE-392:
---
Priority: Major (was: Blocker)
> Stack Overflow when launching jobs
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207207#comment-15207207
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-397:
-
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commente
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/277#discussion_r57061658
--- Diff: api/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/api/Context.java ---
@@ -101,6 +101,20 @@
String getJVMOptions(List operatorMetaList
Atri,
Yes they do.
Thks
Amol
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> Do the committers retain their committer rights, when the project graduates
> to TLP (non PMC members)?
>
> +1 for graduation
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Siyuan Hua
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Tue,
+1
Regards,
Ashwin.
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar wrote:
> +1.
>
> Regards,
> Chinmay.
>
> ---
> Sent from mobile.
> On 22 Mar 2016 11:55 p.m., "Milind Barve" wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > ~Milind
> > On Mar 22, 2016 11:50 PM, "Tushar Gosavi"
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
+1 (binding)
Thks
Amol
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Pramod Immaneni wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> Based on the positive discussion, I'm calling for the community VOTE
> to graduate Apache Apex (incubating) to top level project (TLP).
>
> Please vote on the resolution pasted below.
>
> [ ]
+1
On Mar 22, 2016 2:09 PM, "Ashwin Chandra Putta"
wrote:
> +1
>
> Regards,
> Ashwin.
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
> chin...@datatorrent.com
> > wrote:
>
> > +1.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Chinmay.
> >
> > ---
> > Sent from mobile.
> > On 22 Mar 2016 11:55 p.m., "Milind Bar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207061#comment-15207061
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-326:
-
Github user bhupeshchawda commented o
Github user bhupeshchawda commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/282#issuecomment-199967100
@davidyan74 Please review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
I believe so too. Even if it an official policy, we should carry over
committers as is.
Thks
Amol
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Thomas Weise
wrote:
> My understanding is committers are automatically carried over. Can mentors
> please confirm?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Atri Sh
Sorry I meant "Even if it *not *an official policy, ..."
Thks
Amol
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Amol Kekre wrote:
>
> I believe so too. Even if it an official policy, we should carry over
> committers as is.
>
> Thks
> Amol
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Thomas Weise
> wrote:
>
>
+1
~Bhupesh
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:11 AM, Chinmay Kolhatkar wrote:
> +1.
>
> Regards,
> Chinmay.
>
> ---
> Sent from mobile.
> On 22 Mar 2016 11:55 p.m., "Milind Barve" wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > Regards,
> > ~Milind
> > On Mar 22, 2016 11:50 PM, "Tushar Gosavi"
> wrote:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15207039#comment-15207039
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-326:
-
GitHub user bhupeshchawda opened a pu
GitHub user bhupeshchawda opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/282
APEXCORE-326: Bug fix. Added unit test.
Fixed validation in case of multiple streams between two operators.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
My understanding is committers are automatically carried over. Can mentors
please confirm?
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Atri Sharma wrote:
> Do the committers retain their committer rights, when the project graduates
> to TLP (non PMC members)?
>
> +1 for graduation
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 201
Do the committers retain their committer rights, when the project graduates
to TLP (non PMC members)?
+1 for graduation
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:43 PM, Siyuan Hua wrote:
> +1
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Pramod Immaneni
> wrote:
>
> > Dear Community,
> >
> > Based on the positive di
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
