I have collected some open topics/questions for discussion already from
folks who already reviewed the code
1.The name, name of the Stream and the StreamSource
2. Build dag in an incremental way vs lazy population. Incremental way is
easier to implement (what I did right now) and it create one ed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225759#comment-15225759
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2043:
Github user asfgit closed th
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/142
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise resolved APEXMALHAR-2043.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Update checkstyle plugin declaration to use apex-codestyle-conf
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/231
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/156
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/153
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Hi community,
I have submitted my first commit of stream api into my public repository
here
https://github.com/siyuanh/incubator-apex-malhar/tree/stream
You can think this is the prototype of the Java Stream API proposal here
https://docs.google.com/document/d/163LmQjX860b61NDe3ZzR0hRTPtE-4GF0iH
Report posted to Wiki:
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2016
Thanks
On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Chris Nauroth
wrote:
> +1. Thank you, Thomas. I'll add my mentor sign-off after this makes it
> into wiki.
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
>
>
>
> On 4/2/16, 10:45 PM, "Thomas Weise" wrote:
>
>
Okay so I will open the pull request soon.
-Priyanka
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 1:35 PM, Yogi Devendra wrote:
> This looks OK. Let us build it incrementally.
>
> ~ Yogi
>
> On 23 March 2016 at 13:24, Sandeep Deshmukh
> wrote:
>
> > I would suggest that we go ahead with design as suggested by Priy
Hi Ilya,
After the Map or List is created it will work like a normal in memory java
List or Map. We can simplify instantiating the object further though by
automatically generating the Key Prefixes in the StateFactory object and
only requiring the bucket to be specified once on the StateFactory li
Could this be an opportunity to abstract away the bucket/key relation? This is
a rather cumbersome mechanism. For the user, having a primary and secondary key
in this instance seems like it makes it more difficult to use the system easily.
Sent with Good (www.good.com)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225677#comment-15225677
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2043:
Github user chandnisingh com
Github user chandnisingh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/231#discussion_r58486048
--- Diff: library/pom.xml ---
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
Apache Apex Malhar (incubating) Library
+false
--- End di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225655#comment-15225655
]
Thomas Weise edited comment on APEXMALHAR-2026 at 4/5/16 4:12 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225655#comment-15225655
]
Thomas Weise commented on APEXMALHAR-2026:
--
How will the key object be seria
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225639#comment-15225639
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2043:
Github user tweise commented
Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/231#discussion_r58483684
--- Diff: library/pom.xml ---
@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
Apache Apex Malhar (incubating) Library
+false
--- End diff --
Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/294#discussion_r58482984
--- Diff:
engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/client/StramAppLauncher.java ---
@@ -210,14 +239,67 @@ public StramAppLauncher(FileSystem fs,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225617#comment-15225617
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-411:
-
Github user tweise commented on a dif
Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/294#discussion_r58482768
--- Diff: engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/cli/DTCli.java ---
@@ -1861,49 +1862,60 @@ public void execute(String[] args, ConsoleReader
r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225611#comment-15225611
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-411:
-
Github user tweise commented on a dif
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-409?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Yan resolved APEXCORE-409.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
> Document json application format
> ---
The devel-3 branch has been removed. Finally!
On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Sandeep Deshmukh
wrote:
> +1. We need to move out of devel-3 branch asap.
>
> Regards,
> Sandeep
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:40 PM, David Yan wrote:
>
> > +1. Let's get rid of it!
> > On Mar 25, 2016 9:36 AM, "Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise resolved APEXMALHAR-1969.
--
Resolution: Fixed
> Add idempotency support to 0.9 KafkaInputOperator
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise updated APEXMALHAR-1969:
-
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
> Add idempotency support to 0.9 KafkaInputOperator
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225463#comment-15225463
]
Thomas Weise commented on APEXMALHAR-1969:
--
https://github.com/apache/incuba
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/205
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225411#comment-15225411
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2043:
GitHub user chandnisingh ope
GitHub user chandnisingh opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/231
APEXMALHAR-2043 using property logViolationsToConsole instead of consâ¦
â¦oleOutput
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://gi
Hi All,
I'll be working on implementing Spooled Data structures. The overall
proposal is the following:
Overall design proposal:
Spooled Data structures will be designed to work ontop of a key value
store. Spooled data structures would be used as a component inside of an
operator. The way the co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225391#comment-15225391
]
Timothy Farkas edited comment on APEXMALHAR-2026 at 4/5/16 12:36 AM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225391#comment-15225391
]
Timothy Farkas commented on APEXMALHAR-2026:
Overall design proposal:
Sp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225383#comment-15225383
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user davidyan74 commented on t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2043?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chandni Singh reopened APEXMALHAR-2043:
---
In Malhar we were enabling/disabling logging to console with the property
`consoleOu
Github user davidyan74 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205560349
@ilooner OK
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Yan updated APEXCORE-420:
---
Description: The operator will get stuck initially, and STRAM marks it
blocked because the window ID
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise updated APEXCORE-419:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
> When operator is blocked, print out a warning instead of debug
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas Weise resolved APEXCORE-419.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> When operator is blocked, print out a warning instead of debug
> ---
David Yan created APEXCORE-420:
--
Summary: When operator is declared @Stateless, the operator does
not start correctly when restarting from a terminated app
Key: APEXCORE-420
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225377#comment-15225377
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-419:
-
Github user asfgit closed the pull re
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/293
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225376#comment-15225376
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user ilooner commented on the
Github user ilooner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205558086
@PramodSSImmaneni @davidyan74 I have added tests. @davidyan74 I don't
think your suggestion would work because it does not account for the
ProcessMode and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225350#comment-15225350
]
Timothy Farkas commented on APEXMALHAR-2026:
The use case of a map of lis
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Yan reassigned APEXCORE-411:
--
Assignee: David Yan
> Restart app without specifying app package
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-411?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225270#comment-15225270
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-411:
-
GitHub user davidyan74 opened a pull
GitHub user davidyan74 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/294
APEXCORE-411 support restarting app without app package or jar files
@tweise please review
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-339?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225223#comment-15225223
]
Pramod Immaneni commented on APEXCORE-339:
--
Follow development here
https://git
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225192#comment-15225192
]
Thomas Weise commented on APEXMALHAR-2026:
--
I believe #2 can be is supported
Hi,
Siyuan mentioned that we definitely want to have some CEP model supported.
Translate a CEP model explained here (
https://people.cs.umass.edu/~yanlei/publications/sase-sigmod08.pdf) or
Oracle CEP to Apex DAG would make many developers' life easier to use
Apex.
I also believe this can make the
Hi Siyuan,
Thank you. I'm just back from my PTO.
It makes complete sense to have a CEP model supported. I'm starting an
email thread on it.
Thanks,
Rodrigo Abreu.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:26 PM Siyuan Hua wrote:
> Rodrigo,
>
> You are very welcome to the community.
> We definitely want to h
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chandni Singh updated APEXMALHAR-2025:
--
Fix Version/s: 3.4.0
> Move FileLineInputOperator out of AbstractFileInputOperator
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chandni Singh resolved APEXMALHAR-2025.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Move FileLineInputOperator out of AbstractFileInputOperator
>
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/220
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2025?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15225009#comment-15225009
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2025:
Github user asfgit closed th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224944#comment-15224944
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-419:
-
Github user tweise commented on the p
Github user tweise commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/293#issuecomment-205469590
Please check what happens after this message is logged. If the affected
operators are reset, then why do we need this message?
---
If your project is set u
Github user tweise commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/293#discussion_r58437448
--- Diff:
engine/src/main/java/com/datatorrent/stram/StreamingContainerManager.java ---
@@ -1911,12 +1911,17 @@ public void updateRecoveryCheckpoi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224941#comment-15224941
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-419:
-
Github user tweise commented on a dif
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-419?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224903#comment-15224903
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-419:
-
GitHub user davidyan74 opened a pull
GitHub user davidyan74 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/293
APEXCORE-419 #resolve when operator is marked blocked, print out a warning
instead of debug
@PramodSSImmaneni please merge
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by r
David Yan created APEXCORE-419:
--
Summary: When operator is blocked, print out a warning instead of
debug
Key: APEXCORE-419
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-419
Project: Apache Apex Cor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224737#comment-15224737
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user sandeshh commented on the
Github user sandeshh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205434534
@PramodSSImmaneni I am for having both the changes in.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205432955
@sandeshh as @ilooner mentioned this shouldn't be happening in the first
place so I don't think we would need a flag
---
If your project is set u
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224731#comment-15224731
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commente
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224726#comment-15224726
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user ilooner commented on the
Github user ilooner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205431850
@PramodSSImmaneni will add test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224713#comment-15224713
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commente
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224710#comment-15224710
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commente
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205429004
@davidyan74 Will need a lot more refactoring to handle in Node as control
tuples are being processed in the specific Node types.
---
If your proj
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224705#comment-15224705
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user sandeshh commented on the
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205428578
@ilooner Change looks good, can you add a test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Gi
Github user sandeshh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205428183
How about having the flag in CheckPoint function which decides whether to
overwrite the existing checkpoints or not ?
---
If your project is set up for i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224694#comment-15224694
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user davidyan74 commented on t
Github user davidyan74 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205426991
@ilooner @PramodSSImmaneni I see. Then shouldn't this change be in Node?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224689#comment-15224689
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user ilooner commented on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224687#comment-15224687
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commente
Github user ilooner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205426336
@davidyan74 There was a similar bug in Generic Node which I fixed and got
merged before. The problem happens when The Operator CheckpointWindowCount is a
m
Github user PramodSSImmaneni commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205426102
@davidyan74 I think this check happens for other nodes but is not happening
for InputNode
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224680#comment-15224680
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user davidyan74 commented on t
Github user davidyan74 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205424902
@ilooner Does this only happen in the InputNode? How about overriding the
checkpoint() method in the InputNode for setting and checking for
lastCheckpoi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224668#comment-15224668
]
Chandni Singh commented on APEXMALHAR-2044:
---
The exception is being thrown
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224650#comment-15224650
]
Tushar Gosavi commented on APEXMALHAR-2044:
---
Malhar version is 3.3.0-incuba
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224612#comment-15224612
]
Chandni Singh commented on APEXMALHAR-2044:
---
which version of Malhar?
> Ex
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15224608#comment-15224608
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXCORE-415:
-
Github user ilooner commented on the
Github user ilooner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-core/pull/292#issuecomment-205413237
@davidyan74 Please review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2044?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chandni Singh reassigned APEXMALHAR-2044:
-
Assignee: Chandni Singh
> Exception in AbstractFileOutputOperator during wri
Tushar Gosavi created APEXMALHAR-2044:
-
Summary: Exception in AbstractFileOutputOperator during write.
Key: APEXMALHAR-2044
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2044
Project: Apach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXCORE-316?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223896#comment-15223896
]
pradeep kumbhar commented on APEXCORE-316:
--
Hi [~timothyfarkas], I have not obs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223881#comment-15223881
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2014:
GitHub user shubham-pathak22
GitHub user shubham-pathak22 reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/230
APEXMALHAR-2014 added parquet reader
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/shubham-pathak22/incubator-apex-m
Github user shubham-pathak22 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/230
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223873#comment-15223873
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2014:
Github user shubham-pathak22
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223865#comment-15223865
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2014:
GitHub user shubham-pathak22
GitHub user shubham-pathak22 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/230
APEXMALHAR-2014 added parquet reader
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/shubham-pathak22/incubator-apex-mal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2014?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223863#comment-15223863
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-2014:
Github user shubham-pathak22
Github user shubham-pathak22 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/219
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-1980?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15223823#comment-15223823
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on APEXMALHAR-1980:
Github user DT-Priyanka clos
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
