Hi,
There is some work going on the JDBC polling operator as per,
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2066
The feature set of this operator seems to be similar.That being said, I see
the rationale in updating the existing one since it works with POJO's
already.
Why remove fetch dire
@Thomas,@Amol I would like to contribute/collaborate on this.
Will create a ticket for the same.
Thanks,
Dev
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Thomas Weise
wrote:
> The documentation is here and is indexed:
>
> http://apex.apache.org/docs/malhar/
>
> I think this is a matter of enhancing it.
>
+1
Thanks,
Dev
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Amol Kekre wrote:
> +1
>
> Thks
> Amol
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 1:16 PM, Siyuan Hua
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:56 PM, David Yan
> wrote:
> >
> > > I strongly agree with this statement in the email, "high-volume lists
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2033?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15216823#comment-15216823
]
devendra tagare commented on APEXMALHAR-2033:
-
Has an apache license
Failure in reading a record should not cause a failure to read the entire
file.
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:18 AM, chinmaykolhatkar
wrote:
> Github user chinmaykolhatkar commented on a diff in the pull request:
>
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-apex-malhar/pull/211#discussion_r57762245
>
devendra tagare created APEXMALHAR-2034:
---
Summary: Avro File Input Operator
Key: APEXMALHAR-2034
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2034
Project: Apache Apex Malhar
devendra tagare created APEXMALHAR-2033:
---
Summary: Streaming JSON parser
Key: APEXMALHAR-2033
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2033
Project: Apache Apex Malhar
devendra tagare created APEXMALHAR-2032:
---
Summary: MapReduce Input format support for File Splitter
Key: APEXMALHAR-2032
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2032
Project
Is the plan to align the tuple writer with the org.apache.hadoop.mapred output
formats ?
https://hadoop.apache.org/docs/r2.6.1/api/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/OutputFormat.html
The advantage of this would be that Apex can be used for ETL's to write
mapreduce compatible output files which can be used
; > ~ Yogi
> >
> > On 24 March 2016 at 10:47, Priyanka Gugale
> > wrote:
> >
> > > So as I understand splitter would be format aware, in that case would
> we
> > > need different kinds of parser we have right now? Or the format aware
> > >
Hi,
You can create a case class.Then map the incoming RDD's to the case class &
convert the map to a data frame.By doing this you would have a Dataframe
with the respective fields and associated datatypes set as per the ETL
rules defined before setting the members of the case class.
Sample below
Hi All,
Initiating this thread to get the community's opinion on aligning the
FileSplitter with InputSplit & the BlockReader with the RecordReader from
org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.InputSplit &
org.apache.hadoop.mapreduce.RecordReader respectively.
Some more details and rationale on the approach,
Hi All,
I am working on adding a concrete implementation for reading Avro container
files by extending the AbstractFileInputOperator & emitting Generic Records
based on the file schema.
This operator would be an input adapter and can work together with the Avro
to POJO operator to read an Avro co
Hi All,
Starting this thread to get opinions for adding a streaming JSON parser for
converting a JSON to POJO.This parser would be in addition to the databind
parser (com.fasterxml.jackson.databind) we already have.
The advantage of a streaming JSON parser is,
1.The parser need not parse entire
+ 1
~Dev
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Ashish Tadose
wrote:
> + 1
>
> Thanks,
> Ashish
>
> > On 23-Mar-2016, at 3:19 AM, Bright Chen wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Thanks
> > Bright
> >
> >> On Mar 22, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Sairam Kannan
> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1
> >> On Mar 22, 2016 2:09 PM, "Ashwin
+1.Using it was a bit of a search earlier.Moving it would defiantly ease up
usage.
Thanks,
Dev
On Mar 21, 2016 10:46 PM, "Tushar Gosavi" wrote:
> +1 on moving it out as a separate class.
>
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 8:21 AM, Sandesh Hegde
> wrote:
>
> > +1, I was wondering why it was hidden. Us
gt; > > Parquet file from that file system using this plugin.
> > >
> > > ~ Yogi
> > >
> > > On 14 March 2016 at 11:31, Tushar Gosavi
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> Does Parquet support partitioned
+ 1
~Dev
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Shubham Pathak
wrote:
> Hello Community,
>
> I am working on developing a ParquetReaderOperator which will allow apex
> users to read parquet files.
>
> Apache Parquet is a columnar storage format available to any project in the
> Hadoop ecosystem, reg
Hi,
I am working on developing a record converter which would take a POJO as an
input and emit a Generic record as the output based on the given Avro
schema.
JIRA : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2011
Additionally, I would develop a record converter which would take an Avro
Ge
+1
Dev
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 5:38 PM, Yogi Devendra
wrote:
> Forgot to add in earlier email:
>
> +1 for this operator.
>
> ~ Yogi
>
> On 8 March 2016 at 17:03, Yogi Devendra wrote:
>
> > Can we think of better name than Transform operator?
> > May be:
> > Expression operator
> >
> > Reason:
devendra tagare created APEXMALHAR-2012:
---
Summary: Avro Record to POJO converter
Key: APEXMALHAR-2012
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2012
Project: Apache Apex Malhar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2011?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
devendra tagare updated APEXMALHAR-2011:
Issue Type: New Feature (was: Bug)
> POJO to Avro record conver
devendra tagare created APEXMALHAR-2011:
---
Summary: POJO to Avro record converter
Key: APEXMALHAR-2011
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/APEXMALHAR-2011
Project: Apache Apex Malhar
Hi,
A clarification on 3.1,
Does size here imply both the size in MB and in # events or either?
If yes, then the file should be rolled on whichever is earlier between size
in MB/# events/ time.
~Dev
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:54 PM, Yogi Devendra
wrote:
> Here is the summary of discussion till
24 matches
Mail list logo