Andrew Jensen wrote:
Frank I understand your point about not releasing every fix possible
in every maintenance release as a form
of risk management. I also did a quick query off IssueZilla finding
108 defects marked for target of 2.0.2
that have been changed to resolved in the last 369 days (
Hi there,
Moving the jar and its matching DLL to another location solves the
problem in this case, *but* I would like to use the Java extension
mechanism as this would ease deployment where different applications
want to use the supplied functionality (one being OOo, of course).
Any ideas/hi
Hi there,
went out and found some infos on Sun's documentation, but still
wouldn't know a solution to the problem. Here's the use case:
a C/++ program loads and uses a Java class that resides in an
extension jar (copied to .../jre/lib/ext); that Java class is used to
invoke Java classes any
Felix E. Klee wrote:
I've written an extension that is to be used by two different kinds of users:
MDs and their secretaries. The secretaries should be able to use the entire
functionality, i.e. they should be able to use all menu items. However, for
the MDs at least one menu item should be g
I'd like to move (rename) a file from withing OO Basic (OO 1.1.4).
How do I best do that?
Currently I'm using
Shell("mv '" & source & "' '" & destination & "'")
but AFAICS this doesn't let me check whether the command actually succeeded
unless I use complicated measures such as a temporary f
I've written an extension that is to be used by two different kinds of users:
MDs and their secretaries. The secretaries should be able to use the entire
functionality, i.e. they should be able to use all menu items. However, for
the MDs at least one menu item should be grayed out.
How do I g
Am Donnerstag, 5. Januar 2006 10:51 schrieben Sie:
> How do I best do that?
Solution found: "Name".
--
Dipl.-Phys. Felix E. Klee
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (work), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (home)
Tel: +49 721 8307937, Fax: +49 721 8307936
Linuxburg, Goethestr. 15A, 76135 Karlsruhe, Germany
-
Hi Andrew,
> I would think that if the defect merited the allocation of the developrs
> time to implement the fix it merits the time to be tested to the extent
> needed for release. The fact will remain that only the development
> staff involved can judge what that effort really is.
>
> Look at
Hi Drew,
Further, I suppose it is reasonable that a person should make note
of the fact that a defect marked as resolved but not given a target
milestone is not in the queue to be released.
when the task was fixed and the corresponding cws was created
only OOo 2.0.x and OOo Later targets were
My personal opinion here (again without having judged the concrete case)
is that if an issue is annoying people for that long time, and this is
shown by votes, constant complaints, whatever, it should get some points
on the pro-include-in-2.0.x side - it might be considered a "customer
esc
Hi Andrew,
> But Bernard has a very valid point also. ...
I didn't question this, but wrote
>>I can't talk about the concrete issue here, but let me say a general
>>word about those other 74 ...
Honestly, I simple didn't follow the whole thread, only Bernard's last
mail sprung to my attention b
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hi there,
have been running over a very strange problem (RedHat Fedora Core 3, OOo
2.0.1 installed parallel to OOo 1.1.4): addressing OOo via Java (using a
Java archive that itself uses native code that uses JNI 1.2).
If setting up the environment (CLASSPATH, PATH, i
12 matches
Mail list logo
