Re: [api-dev] XScannerManager anomalia between UNO IDL and Java binding

2006-12-27 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Hi Josi, Marton József wrote: Hi, the following applies at least to OOo 2.0.4 and 2.1 on WinXP (sry, now I don't have access to a linux box with a scanner or similar attached to): in the IDL reference (and in the IDL definition) com::sun::star::scanner::XScannerManager.configureScanner has i

[api-dev] XScannerManager anomalia between UNO IDL and Java binding

2006-12-27 Thread Marton József
Hi, the following applies at least to OOo 2.0.4 and 2.1 on WinXP (sry, now I don't have access to a linux box with a scanner or similar attached to): in the IDL reference (and in the IDL definition) com::sun::star::scanner::XScannerManager.configureScanner has its 1st argument defined as [i

Re: [api-dev] Typo in the Developer´s Guide?

2006-12-27 Thread Juergen Schmidt
Fabricio Lemos wrote: In some places, the Developers guide, more specifically on section 7.3.5, named the service attached to a DataBaseTextField as "com.sun.star.text.FieldMaster.Database". It does not correspond to the value returned when you get the FieldMaster, which returns "com.sun.star.tex

[api-dev] Typo in the Developer´s Guide?

2006-12-27 Thread Fabricio Lemos
In some places, the Developers guide, more specifically on section 7.3.5, named the service attached to a DataBaseTextField as "com.sun.star.text.FieldMaster.Database". It does not correspond to the value returned when you get the FieldMaster, which returns "com.sun.star.text.FieldMaster.DataBase"