Re: [api-dev] Attempt for an UNO Undo API

2010-10-18 Thread Malte Timmermann
Hi Ingrid, I must admit that I didn't look more deeply into the proposal yet, so just some comments on your comments: If an action in Calc leads to changes in Chart, and Calc triggers the changes actively, Chart doesn't necessarily need it's own actions in that case. When I perform Undo in Calc,

[api-dev] AddOn works on Windows but not on Linux

2010-10-18 Thread Martin Dobiasch
Hi! My AddOn works fine on Windows but when i try to test it with Ubuntu im not able to even see the toolbar. I'm using same version of OpenOffice on both systems. I can install the extension without problems. What could be wrong with my AddOn? Thanks, Martin

[api-dev] Re: Attempt for an UNO Undo API

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Stahl
On 18/10/2010 14:55, Malte Timmermann wrote: The Undo actions could have pointers to some data which doesn't exist anymore, and the extension can't remove the actions from the UndoManager. Avoiding pointers could mean making the Undo actions more expensive (memory, time). For example, Writer

[api-dev] Re: Attempt for an UNO Undo API

2010-10-18 Thread Björn Michaelsen
Hi Malte, Michael, Am Mon, 18 Oct 2010 15:46:00 +0200 schrieb Michael Stahl michael.x.st...@oracle.com: On 18/10/2010 14:55, Malte Timmermann wrote: The Undo actions could have pointers to some data which doesn't exist anymore, and the extension can't remove the actions from the

Re: [api-dev] Re: Attempt for an UNO Undo API

2010-10-18 Thread Malte Timmermann
I agree that the pointer stuff is bad, but I don't fully agree with broken by design. From a user's perspective, it would look more broken when deleting a selection with 50+ pages would take a reasonable amount of time, only because some expensive Undo information is being created, which probably

Re: [api-dev] Re: Attempt for an UNO Undo API

2010-10-18 Thread Bjoern michaelsen
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:16:32 +0200 Malte Timmermann malte.timmerm...@oracle.com wrote: I agree that the pointer stuff is bad, but I don't fully agree with broken by design. From a user's perspective, it would look more broken when deleting a selection with 50+ pages would take a reasonable