Jinhong Zou wrote:
> There are some trouble with me in the use of open office. I have no
> idea except to ask for help from you.
>
> I want to insert some Macro to the document with the OpenOffice
> API,but I have not found any way could do this successful.
>
> In my mind , to insert
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hmm, how about a menu option allowing editing text with an external
editor like emacs, vim etc. ?
The same would make life for programmers a easier with the scripting
framework editor as well.
Just for the case, that somebody wants to work on this. The key problem
wi
Thank you, Thomas! However, the company I work for does not use the beta version
yet, just OOo 1.1.4. I've just checked that this service is not available
there. Can that be achieved - even if much more hardly - by 1.1.4 UNO
primitives?
No, that's not possible.
Thomas
-
Jorge Marques Pelizzoni wrote:
Hi, all! Once Mathias Bauer wrote:
But why do you want to call Basic macros from C++? I would expect that
you instantiate your (IDE-designed) dialog from your C++ code (should
be possible by some UNO calls) ...
Its is exactly those UNO calls that interest me
Hi Christoph,
Christoph Lutz wrote:
Hi,
I have got a question regarding the scripting-framework and uno-packages
and I hope this is the correct list since the list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
seems to be inactive. If not, please hint me to the correct list.
I want to deploy and invoke scripting-framework-
Hi Mike,
We decided to go for a) and I don't really see any problems
with it. You mentioned the problem with OOo 1.1.x which
always writes to HKEY_CURRENT_USER. This is a bug and very
unfortunate. I think this bug cannot be fixed in OOo 1.1.x
but probably I'm wrong. Therefore I only see two solutio
Hi Mike,
Mike Traum wrote:
Thomas,
I'm not sure what you mean by the user or administrator defining the
default installation. This would be possible in linux/unix, but, from
what I've gathered, there's no way to do this in Windows. OOo 1.1.x
will always trump all other installations (unless there's
Kay Ramme - Sun Germany - Hamburg wrote:
Mike,
Mike Traum wrote:
Kay,
I understand what you're saying about the Bootsrap, but right now,
the Loader is completely dependant on OOo.
As far as the error reporting to the user, this could be done. But,
maybe I wasn't clear because I made some points in
Hi Mike,
you're right. I had some discussion with some experts here, and
the problem is, that when installing OOo 1.1.4 with /NET there's
no registry key written to HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE. When a user starts
the user installation, the registry key is written to
HKEY_CURRENT_USER.
As a real system integ
By 'in the past', does that mean for OOo 1.1.4 (which is the current
stable version of OOo)? That's what I was using.
It's quite likely that there was a space in the filename, and it
definitely wasn't on the C: drive, if that matters.
Any idea then why I was getting that exception?
I just learned,
This can't be changed anymore. Regardless which key is used we would
break compatibility by using a new one in the next version (changes for
OOo2.0 are too late now) just to avoid possible problems with outdated
versions that will get out of use in the near future. So a bug report
would be a waste
Hi Mike,
I guess, the problem is, that you installed OOo 1.1 with user rights
and OOo 1.9 with administrator rights.
On the Windows platform, the UNO installation is found by reading the
default value of the key "Software\OpenOffice.org\UNO\InstallPath" from
the root key HKEY_CURRENT_USER in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
