Hello everyone
I noticed that we have too many installation paths now.
Like the line 20 to 32 of /bin/apisix, we have :
/usr/share/lua/5.1 : by luarocks make or make
install (at CI)
/usr/local/apisix/ : by rpm or docker
/usr/local/apisix/deps/share/lua/5.1/ : by ./utils/install-apisix.sh
ins
I am confused by the ` defined uris(eg: `/dump`)` part. Why should we need
another part for the uri?
Why not use `v1/discovery/dump`?
聂永 于2021年2月1日周一 上午9:53写道：
> Hi,
>
> We don't need hardcode for discovery module's control api path.
>
> The real http api path =
> The fixed prefix: `/v1/discover
Hi,
We don't need hardcode for discovery module's control api path.
The real http api path =
The fixed prefix: `/v1/discovery/` + defined `discovery_type` in yaml (eg:
`eureka`) + defined uris(eg: `/dump`)
2021年1月29日 22:13，Zexuan Luo
mailto:spacewan...@apache.org>> 写道：
discovery typ
It's my pleasure, thanks.
dabue
From: Willem Jiang
Date: 2021-01-31 16:45
To: dev
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new PMC: dabue
Welcome aboard！
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:26 PM Ming Wen wrote:
>
> Hello, community,
> The Project Management Comm
Welcome aboard！
Willem Jiang
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 9:26 PM Ming Wen wrote:
>
> Hello, community,
> The Project Management Committee(PMC) of Apache APISIX has vote passed and
> invited dabue to be a PMC member. We are pleased to announce that he has
> accep
