Re: On the abstraction of vars

Hi, I see there have too many characters to read, would you please send it again? 15717900 <15717...@qq.com>于2021年3月18日 周四下午1:17写道： > 您好： >    sorry I leaved out this email >    The description in your email is accurate. That's what I mean > > >    do we allow to enable `vars` and` vars_id` at t

?????? On the abstraction of vars

??    sorry I leaved out this email    The description in your email is accurate. That's what I mean    do we allow to enable `vars` and` vars_id` at the same time?     on this question , I think it is necessary allow to enable `vars` and` vars_id` at the same time -- ?

Re: [DISCUSS] about the upstream request’s Host header

And we need a plan to do some changes on APISIX IMO, anyone would like to take this issue? Zhiyuan Ju 于2021年3月18日 周四下午1:06写道： > Yep > > Chao Zhang 于2021年3月18日 周四下午1:04写道： > >> I think the point that put forward by Ju is same with what I proposed :) >> >> Chao Zhang >> https://github.com/tokers >>

Re: Call for Presentations for ApacheCon 2021 now open

I have submitted a Proposal 《How to Extend Apache APISIX into The Service Mesh Sidecar》. Chao Zhang https://github.com/tokers On March 18, 2021 at 12:25:20 PM, Zhiyuan Ju (juzhiy...@apache.org) wrote: Hi, Welcome to submit CFP here[1], and I just submitted mine and waiting for review :) [1] ht

Re: [DISCUSS] about the upstream request’s Host header

Yep Chao Zhang 于2021年3月18日 周四下午1:04写道： > I think the point that put forward by Ju is same with what I proposed :) > > Chao Zhang > https://github.com/tokers > > On March 18, 2021 at 11:55:14 AM, Ming Wen (wenm...@apache.org) wrote: > > chao zhang's idea is good for me. > what do you think? > > Th

Re: [DISCUSS] about the upstream request’s Host header

I think the point that put forward by Ju is same with what I proposed :) Chao Zhang https://github.com/tokers On March 18, 2021 at 11:55:14 AM, Ming Wen (wenm...@apache.org) wrote: chao zhang's idea is good for me. what do you think? Thanks, Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair Twitter: _WenMing

Re: Call for Presentations for ApacheCon 2021 now open

Hi, Welcome to submit CFP here[1], and I just submitted mine and waiting for review :) [1] https://acah2021.jamhosted.net/ Best Regards! @ Zhiyuan Ju Ming Wen 于2021年3月9日周二 上午8:41写道： > hello, > the Call For Presentations (CFP) for ApacheCon@Home 2021 is now open

Re: [DISCUSS] about the upstream request’s Host header

chao zhang's idea is good for me. what do you think? Thanks, Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair Twitter: _WenMing Zhiyuan Ju 于2021年3月18日周四 上午11:49写道： > Any conclusion and plan here? > > There has 1 related PR[1]. > > [1] https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/pull/1603 > > Best Regards! > @

Re: [DISCUSS] about the upstream request’s Host header

Any conclusion and plan here? There has 1 related PR[1]. [1] https://github.com/apache/apisix-dashboard/pull/1603 Best Regards! @ Zhiyuan Ju Zhiyuan Ju 于2021年3月17日周三 下午11:22写道： > yep, after going through Tyk & Kong, I would agree to use `preserve_host` > to rep

[ANNOUNCE] new PMC: chao zhang

Hello, community, The Project Management Committee(PMC) of Apache APISIX has vote passed and invited tokers(chao zhang) to be a PMC member. We are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Congratulations chao zhang and welcome to join us. Thanks, Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair Twitter: _WenMi

Support traffic split feature in APISIX Ingress Controller

Hi, there I'm devoting myself to implement the traffic split feature in APISIX Ingress Controller, which relies on the traffic split (http://apisix.apache.org/docs/apisix/plugins/traffic-split) plugin in APISIX. Considering the traffic split plugin uses some reference relationship like "upstream_

Re: Promoting ApacheCon on your (project) website(s)

Hi If you want to discuss this on the mail list, please mail to dev-subscr...@apisix.apache.org, follow the reply to subscribe to the mail list. This email of yours was passed by me manually. Thanks, Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair Twitter: _WenMing Qi Guo 于2021年3月18日周四 上午9:37写道： > I have

Re: Promoting ApacheCon on your (project) website(s)

I have read through the guide in this mail, will do it ASAP. 郭奇 于2021年3月18日周四 上午9:32写道： > Hi, > > I would like to take this task and give a try! > > Zhiyuan Ju 于2021年3月18日周四 上午1:03写道： > >> >> Best Regards! >> @ Zhiyuan Ju >> >> >> -- Forwarded message

Re: [DISCUSS] about the upstream request’s Host header

yep, after going through Tyk & Kong, I would agree to use `preserve_host` to replace the current 3 opinions. Best Regards! @ Zhiyuan Ju Ming Wen 于2021年3月17日周三 下午5:44写道： > nice！ > +1 > > Chao Zhang 于2021年3月17日 周三下午3:12写道： > > > Why not just use one option, "Preser

Re: Promoting ApacheCon on your (project) website(s)

lgtm, anyone would like to have a try? We will wait for 48 hours, or I will handle this one. Ming Wen 于2021年3月17日 周三下午10:27写道： > hello, dev, > We can add the ApacheCon in apisix. a.o > > -- 转发的邮件 - > 发件人： Rich Bowen > 日期：2021年3月17日 周三下午10:12 > 主题：Promoti

Fwd: Promoting ApacheCon on your (project) website(s)

hello, dev, We can add the ApacheCon in apisix. a.o -- 转发的邮件 - 发件人： Rich Bowen 日期：2021年3月17日 周三下午10:12 主题：Promoting ApacheCon on your (project) website(s) 收件人：Apache Members Hi, folks, Now that the CFP is open for both ApacheCon @Home 2021, and Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] about the upstream request’s Host header

nice！ +1 Chao Zhang 于2021年3月17日 周三下午3:12写道： > Why not just use one option, "Preserve Client Host”, by default it’s > closed, which means the Host header will be rewrite to the Upstream host; > When it’s opened, the client host will inherited > when proxying to upstream. > > Chao Zhang > https://g

Re: [DISCUSS] about the upstream request’s Host header

Why not just use one option, "Preserve Client Host”, by default it’s closed, which means the Host header will be rewrite to the Upstream host; When it’s opened, the client host will inherited when proxying to upstream. Chao Zhang https://github.com/tokers On March 17, 2021 at 2:49:50 PM, Ming Wen