Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty

I think there may be some ambiguity in this title, and I need to clarify a few points: 1. The purpose of this email is to discuss the recommendation of using apisix-base as the runtime going forward. 2. We will no longer recommend or maintain the use of openresty as the runtime (removing CI and add

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty

We will NEVER drop the support of OpenResty. APSIX is based on OpenResty. You can add patches on OpenResty, but it is not drop. Thanks, Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair Twitter: _WenMing wei liu 于2023年8月4日周五 17:09写道： > LGTM > > On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM Xin Rong wrote: > > > In the earl

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty

LGTM On Fri, Aug 4, 2023 at 5:04 PM Xin Rong wrote: > In the earliest versions, APISIX used Openresty as the runtime, but > OpenResty often failed to meet APISIX's scalability needs. To solve > this problem, we built apisix-base and have been running on it for > over a year. > > > For example, t

[DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty

In the earliest versions, APISIX used Openresty as the runtime, but OpenResty often failed to meet APISIX's scalability needs. To solve this problem, we built apisix-base and have been running on it for over a year. For example, these features can only run in the apisix-base environment: * upstr

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty 1.17.8

+1, and it's time for us to introduce some new features in version 1.21 — Thanks， Shirui Zhao > 2022年7月7日 22:44，Jintao Zhang > 写道： > > are also more vulnerable to security attacks

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty 1.17.8

+1 Too old versions are also more vulnerable to security attacks Ming Wen 于2022年7月7日周四 19:38写道： > +1 > Apache APISIX can use new features more, instead of being dragged down by > old versions > > Thanks, > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair > Twitter: _WenMing > > > tzssangglass 于2022年7月7日周四 16

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty 1.17.8

+1 Apache APISIX can use new features more, instead of being dragged down by old versions Thanks, Ming Wen, Apache APISIX PMC Chair Twitter: _WenMing tzssangglass 于2022年7月7日周四 16:26写道： > +1 for me. > > *ZhengSong Tu* > My GitHub: https://github.com/tzssangglass > Apache APISIX: https://github.

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty 1.17.8

+1 for me. *ZhengSong Tu* My GitHub: https://github.com/tzssangglass Apache APISIX: https://github.com/apache/apisix 在 2022年7月7日 16:18:42 上，Zexuan Luo 写道： > As we now support OpenResty 1.21.4 and make it as default, time to > consider dropping the support of OpenResty 1.17.8. > > OpenResty 1.1

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty 1.17.8

+1 as well, for the maintenance cost reduction reason. On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 10:23 AM İlteriş Yağıztegin Eroğlu < ilteris.ero...@trendyol.com> wrote: > > > On 7 Jul 2022, at 11:18, Zexuan Luo wrote: > > > > By dropping the support of OpenResty 1.17.8, we can remove extra CI > > job and version

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty 1.17.8

> On 7 Jul 2022, at 11:18, Zexuan Luo wrote: > > By dropping the support of OpenResty 1.17.8, we can remove extra CI > job and version check, making the code simpler. > > What about your opinion? I approve of this, as supporting much older base (>2 yrs) will create more effort to keep support

[DISCUSS] Drop the support of OpenResty 1.17.8

As we now support OpenResty 1.21.4 and make it as default, time to consider dropping the support of OpenResty 1.17.8. OpenResty 1.17.8 is released more than 2 years ago. And we have a tradition to support only the latest three versions of OpenResty, which are 1.19.3 / 1.19.9 / 1.21.4 now. By drop