> From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 5:06 PM
>
> How do win32 users run the ./configure script without downloading
> Cygwin? Also, have you tried recent versions of Cygwin? The old
> install process really sucked, but new versions have a nice
> GUI install
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 1:01 PM
>
> > > When I originally wrote the buildexports stuff, we didn't require Perl to
> > > build Apache, because that file could be generated once and just bundled
> > > with Apache. With the move to crea
> -Original Message-
> From: Mo DeJong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 3:56 PM
> To: dev@apr.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: RE: *.exports in distro bundle, use
> of , Perl on Windows (was: Re: make_export.awk)]
>
>
> >
> > I'll change, no pro
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 03:06:24PM -0800, Mo DeJong wrote:
>...
> How do win32 users run the ./configure script without downloading
> Cygwin? Also, have you tried recent versions of Cygwin? The old
> install process really sucked, but new versions have a nice
> GUI installer that downloads all the
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > > I would like to know why perl is used to determine how easy it
> > > would be to replace with something that has a better shot at
> > > being installed on every box that someone might want to build
> > > apr on.
> >
> > Feel free to provid
Here is another patch that fixes the RUN_SUBDIR_CONFIG_NOW
macro when it is run from the build directory and the
macro gets included into a configure.in from another
project. The problem was the the system did not know
where the helpers dir was.
Index: aclocal.m4
==
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Greg Stein wrote:
> - Forwarded message from "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE: *.exports in distro bundle, use of Perl on Windows (was: Re:
> make_export.awk)
> To: "'Greg Stein'" <[EMAIL
> Actually this brings up a huge issue. I'm currently battling rewrites in
> the Windows .msi installer, trying to make a 'native' extension for this
> job, or we will have to bundle 1. our own rewriter, or 2. someone else's
> rewriter. If we bundle gnu awk, we just fell into a deep pit we aren't
- Forwarded message from "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: *.exports in distro bundle, use of Perl on Windows (was: Re:
make_export.awk)
To: "'Greg Stein'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2000 15:20:28 -0600
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2000 12:09 PM
>
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
>
> > I had too much free time today, so I created make_export.awk.
> > During that I noticed that I either lack some awk knowledge
> > or t
> We should document that URL for fetching a Windows-compatible AWK. Are there
> binary distributions? I'd also be fine redistributing from apache.org so
> that people don't have to hunt this stuff down at other sites.
Three candidates (create exactly the same output):
gawk 3.0.6 for Win3
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 12:36:55PM -0800, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 10:28:07AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>...
> > When I originally wrote the buildexports stuff, we didn't require Perl to
> > build Apache, because that file could be generated once and just bundled
> > with A
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:41:34PM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > Hmm. Have you noticed apr_MD5Encode and apr_get_home_directory are in there
> > twice? Is it possible that you're getting doubles? Maybe you have a backup
> > copy of apr_uuid.h and apr_md5.h in your include directory, and it's pi
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 09:27:13PM +0100, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > What makes you think the awk solution is any more portable than the Perl
> > solution? I would much rather determine what is happening than to just
> > give up on the Perl solution. Please take a look at the definition of
> > th
> Hmm. Have you noticed apr_MD5Encode and apr_get_home_directory are in there
> twice? Is it possible that you're getting doubles? Maybe you have a backup
> copy of apr_uuid.h and apr_md5.h in your include directory, and it's picking
> them up?
line was not cleared correctly. Whoops. I used
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 10:28:07AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > I dislike this idea. I realize (now) that awk is available on Windows,
> > > but Perl is already required to build Apache on Windows, and all of a
> > > sudden we are going to add the requirement of awk too. Why? We already
> What makes you think the awk solution is any more portable than the Perl
> solution? I would much rather determine what is happening than to just
> give up on the Perl solution. Please take a look at the definition of
> those functions and make sure they actually match the regex. You could
> t
On Sat, Dec 16, 2000 at 10:09:24AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > I had too much free time today, so I created make_export.awk.
> > During that I noticed that I either lack some awk knowledge
> > or that the awk's expression mechanism l
> > I would love to know what it is. The regex isn't that complex, and
> > regex's in Perl shouldn't have really changed between 5.005_02 and
> > 5.005_03. Hm
>
> I can repeat the same effect on another machine with Red Hat
> 5.1 (also 5.005_02).
>
> Are we going to raise th
> I would love to know what it is. The regex isn't that complex, and
> regex's in Perl shouldn't have really changed between 5.005_02 and
> 5.005_03. Hm
I can repeat the same effect on another machine with Red Hat
5.1 (also 5.005_02).
Are we going to raise the entry barrier f
> > When I originally wrote the buildexports stuff, we didn't require Perl to
> > build Apache, because that file could be generated once and just bundled
> > with Apache. With the move to create those files during the build steps,
> > we now require Perl just to build. I think the best solution
> When I originally wrote the buildexports stuff, we didn't require Perl to
> build Apache, because that file could be generated once and just bundled
> with Apache. With the move to create those files during the build steps,
> we now require Perl just to build. I think the best solution is to mo
> > I dislike this idea. I realize (now) that awk is available on Windows,
> > but Perl is already required to build Apache on Windows, and all of a
> > sudden we are going to add the requirement of awk too. Why? We already
> > require Perl on every platform when building Apache, but we do not
> I dislike this idea. I realize (now) that awk is available on Windows,
> but Perl is already required to build Apache on Windows, and all of a
> sudden we are going to add the requirement of awk too. Why? We already
> require Perl on every platform when building Apache, but we do not
> current
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> I had too much free time today, so I created make_export.awk.
> During that I noticed that I either lack some awk knowledge
> or that the awk's expression mechanism lacks a useful feature
> (backreferencing). I've worked around that by
I had too much free time today, so I created make_export.awk.
During that I noticed that I either lack some awk knowledge
or that the awk's expression mechanism lacks a useful feature
(backreferencing). I've worked around that by using two sub's
in the respective block.
The
> I used Perl because I wanted to learn Perl better. This is also not a
> simple question to answer, and using awk will not solve the problem
> here. Last I checked, Win32 does not have awk, and getting it requires
> that you actually download cygwin.
That is not true. You can get the latest
> Sascha is being obtuse, when he should have simply said what he meant. That
> would have kept the discussion much cleaner (shame on you, Sascha).
If I say "X does not work in context Y", it does not
translate to "I don't like X".
What is so unclear in that sentence? Were peo
Most of you have probably noticed that I have been unusually quiet
recently. I was stuck in Nebraska and without e-mail since Wednesday. I
fully expected to have e-mail that whole time, but my modem doesn't like
me. :-( Anyway, I'm back now, and will be busy getting stuff done again.
Ryan
_
> > I would like to know why perl is used to determine how easy it
> > would be to replace with something that has a better shot at
> > being installed on every box that someone might want to build
> > apr on.
>
> Feel free to provide an awk script which implements the
> equivalent functi
> > > Modified:.STATUS
> > > +* apr_create_lock() changes:
> > ...
> > > + - The fname param is allowed to be NULL on the Unix platform.
> >
> > feature, not bug... Do you mean that the semantics associated with
> > this ("make up a file for me if you need to, APR") ar
> +* apr_create_lock() changes:
> + - It ignores the "type" parameter, so toss it.
> + - The fname param is allowed to be NULL on the Unix platform.
> +Change it to always use the passed value, and check callers.
These are in there by design. The type parameter didn
> > I think it is goofy to place a src directory in a source tree -- everything
> > in the distribution is source. If there are too many subdirectories, then
> > either abstract them into relevant categories or split them into different
> > library modules.
>
> It isn't "a source tree". There is
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 05:59:14PM -0800, Mo DeJong wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
>...
> > In my last email, I tried to communicate to you that you are
> > putting words into my mouth. Nobody likes that, especially if
> > you get it wrong. You have now succeeded i
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > I would like to know why perl is used to determine how easy it
> > would be to replace with something that has a better shot at
> > being installed on every box that someone might want to build
> > apr on.
>
> Feel free to provide an awk script
> I would like to know why perl is used to determine how easy it
> would be to replace with something that has a better shot at
> being installed on every box that someone might want to build
> apr on.
Feel free to provide an awk script which implements the
equivalent functionality.
> Whe
On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Sascha Schumann wrote:
> > Ok, so you don't like automake and gnu make.
>
> May I gently request that you read this article:
>
> http://www.perl.com/pub/2000/12/advocacy.html?wwwrrr_20001213.txt
I have read that article before, and no I am not on an anti-perl
ki
37 matches
Mail list logo
