Re: cvs commit: apr/build aplibtool.c

2001-03-29 Thread Jim Jagielski
This is cool... [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > bjh 01/03/29 07:45:26 > > Added: buildaplibtool.c > Log: > A simple libtool emulator which currently only supports OS/2 but it should > be possible to add other platforms. > -- ==

Re: cvs commit: apr/build aplibtool.c

2001-03-29 Thread rbb
No, this is f***ing cool. :-) Ryan On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote: > This is cool... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > bjh 01/03/29 07:45:26 > > > > Added: buildaplibtool.c > > Log: > > A simple libtool emulator which currently only supports OS/2 but it sho

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2001-03-29 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Index: configure.in > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/configure.in,v > retrieving revision 1.262 > retrieving revision 1.263 > diff -u -r1.262 -r1.263 > --- configure.in2001/03/27 10:48:02

Re: cvs commit: apr-util/xml/expat configure.in

2001-03-29 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Modified:.configure.in >xml/expat configure.in > Log: > Use aplibtool on OS/2. > > Index: configure.in > === > RCS file: /home/cvs/apr-util/configure.in,v > retr

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2001-03-29 Thread Brian Havard
On 29 Mar 2001 11:04:02 -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> Index: configure.in >> === >> RCS file: /home/cvs/apr/configure.in,v >> retrieving revision 1.262 >> retrieving revision 1.263 >> diff -u -

Re: cvs commit: apr/build aplibtool.c

2001-03-29 Thread rbb
Bouncing a misdirected mail. :-) -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:13:39 +0100 From: David Reid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/build aplibtool.c The work that both Jeff and Brian have done is cool :) However, can we try an

Re: cvs commit: apr configure.in

2001-03-29 Thread Jeff Trawick
"Brian Havard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 29 Mar 2001 11:04:02 -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > >The way I do this in my libtool emulator is to provide an > >AC_PROG_LIBTOOL macro in my libtool.m4 to set up the LIBTOOL > >variable. (I compile my .c at make install time for libtool). > > > >C

Re: cvs commit: apr-util/xml/expat configure.in

2001-03-29 Thread Brian Havard
On 29 Mar 2001 11:07:31 -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [...] >> Index: configure.in >> === >> RCS file: /home/cvs/apr-util/xml/expat/configure.in,v >> retrieving revision 1.1 >> retrieving revision 1

APR as a shared library?

2001-03-29 Thread David Reid
Are we doing this yet? If not can we add it to the list for the hackathon? david

Re: cvs commit: apr-util/xml/expat configure.in

2001-03-29 Thread Jeff Trawick
"Brian Havard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 29 Mar 2001 11:07:31 -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote: > > >It seemed cleaner to me to provide an empty AC_LIBTOOL_WIN32_DLL macro > >than to change the expat build. > > Err, actually it's just moved, not removed, into the "everything but OS/2" > section

Re: APR as a shared library?

2001-03-29 Thread rbb
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, David Reid wrote: > Are we doing this yet? If not can we add it to the list for the hackathon? Add it to the list. We gotta get this done. Ryan ___ Ryan Bloom [EMAIL

Re: APR as a shared library?

2001-03-29 Thread David Reid
OK. We're getting a largish list aren't we? :) david (even managed to hit reply-all this time :)) - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David Reid" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "APR Development List" Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 6:08 PM Subject: Re: APR as a shared library?

Re: cvs commit: apr/build aplibtool.c

2001-03-29 Thread Greg Stein
Let's not get too amped up here, folks. Brian just wrote a little proggie that recognizes the libtool command line, enough for OS/2 to function. This isn't going to help us with libtool's primary purpose: dynamic linking across a wide variety of platforms. Cheers, -g On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 08:2

Re: APR as a shared library?

2001-03-29 Thread Greg Stein
For Subversion, we want this, too. We've actually run into problems lately because APR doesn't respond to "make install" and install its libraries. Moreover, it doesn't install its embedded libmm library, either. One of the topics at the Hackathon is shared memory. I'd be happy to toss libmm so th