Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/unix proc.c]

2001-10-19 Thread Jeff Trawick
(sorry for the forward; my sendmail got sick for a while and was discarding messages handed to it by my pop client :( ) Greg Ames [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Original Message Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/unix proc.c Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2001 13:02:25 -0700

Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/unix proc.c]

2001-10-19 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, October 19, 2001 9:45 AM I am very much against changing the API of an APR function temporarily. Returning the native exit code is not the correct solution to this problem, because that code can't really be used in a portable app. If

Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH] Re: cvs commit: apr/threadproc/unix proc.c]

2001-10-19 Thread Ryan Bloom
On Friday 19 October 2001 07:45 am, Jeff Trawick wrote: Expect a patch by Monday night. I have in-laws in town this weekend. :-) your opinion :) mine differs; apr_wait_t (definitely should be called something else) is simply what information the os makes available regarding the dead child

Re: cvs commit: apr/misc/netware aprlib.imp

2001-10-19 Thread Cliff Woolley
On 19 Oct 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: bnicholes01/10/19 12:28:55 Removed: misc/netware aprlib.imp Log: No longer needed. This file is generated by make_nw_export.awk. VERY glad to hear it. :) -- Cliff Woolley