On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 07:57:38AM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jerenkrantz01/12/12 02:05:54
Modified:.STATUS
Log:
Not a big deal, but worth noting. If anyone has an idea on how to
detect this, it'd be general goodness to error out
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe we should try to acquire/release the lock during create time,
and return the acquire errno if that fails. Maybe the error codes
differ between systems but at least we fail ahead of time.
That sounds easy and harmless to me. Any
On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 08:19:19PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I'd like to see this as a lock creation option. Something like
a flag - say, APR_LOCK_VERIFY or some such. I don't think we should
do the acquire/release unless asked for by the caller. I think
this might mean changing or
Justin Erenkrantz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 08:19:19PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
I'd like to see this as a lock creation option. Something like
a flag - say, APR_LOCK_VERIFY or some such. I don't think we should
do the acquire/release unless asked for by the
On Tue, Dec 25, 2001 at 09:47:12PM -0500, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Other than performance, why should the caller care? The lock can't
block. Unbeknownst to the caller we or libc get locks on other
callers.
Still curious,
Hmm. Let me try and restate it. It's a feeling that doing this
would be
About half the startup time for the httpd is spent
locking and unlocking the mutex that protects the
apr_file_t's internal buffer--even though only one
thread is using the file. This patch skips the
locking unless the APR_XTHREAD flag has been set
for the file.
--Brian
Index:
A counterpart to apr_itoa(), so that we can eliminate
some inefficient 'sprintf(foo, %u, bar)' calls in the
httpd.
Index: srclib/apr/include/apr_strings.h
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/apr/include/apr_strings.h,v
retrieving revision
I'm seeing a segfault during child process shutdown with the
worker MPM on Solaris. It appears to happen because the worker
threads do this:
static void *worker_thread(apr_thread_t *thd, void * dummy)
{
proc_info * ti = dummy;
int process_slot = ti-pid;
int thread_slot = ti-tid;
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 04:54:00AM -0800, Brian Pane wrote:
I'm seeing a segfault during child process shutdown with the
worker MPM on Solaris. It appears to happen because the worker
threads do this:
static void *worker_thread(apr_thread_t *thd, void * dummy)
{
proc_info * ti = dummy;
On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 06:10:30PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
#!/bin/sh
+# Remove aclocal.m4 as it'll break some builds...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] aclocal.m4
^
|
Sticky fingers? We're not in a makefile. =) -- justin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
+# Remove aclocal.m4 as it'll break some builds...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] aclocal.m4
Don't you mean
rm -f aclocal.m4
?
I get
...
rebuilding srclib/apr-util/configure
./buildconf: @rm: command not found
Creating include/private/apu_config.h ...
...
--
Jeff
Thanks Jeff.
Fix syntax error. I suspect this is what David intended
in the previous commit.
It is probably closer to what I actually intended. :)
We should maybe try and check if the file exists before we remove it though
to stop silly errors being presented to the user.
david
I'm seeing a lot of errors when trying to decide which db to use in apr-
util. The exact errors will have to wait until I get home, but the final
bit of the error says to use --with-dbm=, but that doesn't work either!!
Any ideas?
david
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ls -l access_log
-rw-r--r-- 1 jerenkrantz other2147484642 Dec 26 14:49 access_log
Yes, I'm a slacker and I don't rotate my logs. This introduced
an interesting problem though.
When the server got rebooted, httpd refused to start since the
file was over the 2GB limit:
14 matches
Mail list logo
