Re: cvs commit: apr/include apr_atomic.h

2002-02-12 Thread Jeff Trawick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > ianh02/02/12 13:49:15 > > Added: atomic/unix apr_atomic.c >include apr_atomic.h try building it with --disable-shared... I dare ya :) -- Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | PGP public key at web site: http://www.geocities.com/

Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/win32 open.c

2002-02-12 Thread Branko Äibej
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wrowe 02/02/11 16:07:34 Modified:file_io/win32 open.c Log: I don't trust that the OS is even returning an error - if the handle is an invalid handle - I'm not certain that's an error. Certainly this code is safer - merits pushing into .32 Revision

Re: cvs commit: apr STATUS

2002-02-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
>From out in left field... this was sitting amidst my drafts. Dunno how relevant it still is. From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 10:30 AM > On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 12:07:58AM +1000, Brian Havard wrote: > > > > On OS/2 the only native mechanism that has cr

Re: Using APR in mod_webapp

2002-02-12 Thread Pier Fumagalli
"jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sander Striker wrote: >> >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Behalf Of jean-frederic clere >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a question: >>> >>> mod_webapp from Tomcat uses APR: >>> >>> Where should APR be downloaded from? - It

[PATCH] use umask in Unix apr_file_attrs_set

2002-02-12 Thread Philip Martin
Hello This patch makes apr_file_attrs_set respect the current umask, rather than unconditionally setting permissions. It's much like my previous patch, but updated to reflect recent changes in apr_file_attrs_set. Philip Index: file_io/unix/filestat.c

Re: Using APR in mod_webapp

2002-02-12 Thread jean-frederic clere
Sander Striker wrote: > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Behalf Of jean-frederic clere > > > Hi, > > > > I have a question: > > > > mod_webapp from Tomcat uses APR: > > > > Where should APR be downloaded from? - It must be a tarball because that is > > for > > the ones t

RE: Using APR in mod_webapp

2002-02-12 Thread Sander Striker
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Behalf Of jean-frederic clere > Hi, > > I have a question: > > mod_webapp from Tomcat uses APR: > > Where should APR be downloaded from? - It must be a tarball because that is > for > the ones that want to build mod_webapp on their own - >

Using APR in mod_webapp

2002-02-12 Thread jean-frederic clere
Hi, I have a question: mod_webapp from Tomcat uses APR: Where should APR be downloaded from? - It must be a tarball because that is for the ones that want to build mod_webapp on their own - Until now I was adding apr to a subdirectory of mod_webapp and releasing the corresponding tarball. (Norma

RE: APR WCE take 3

2002-02-12 Thread Mladen Turk
> -Original Message- > From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 3:31 AM > To: dev@apr.apache.org > Subject: Re: APR WCE take 3 > > From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:24 PM > > > Going back to

Re: cvs commit: apr/strings apr_strnatcmp.c

2002-02-12 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 01:52:35AM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > wrowe 02/02/11 17:52:35 > > Modified:strings apr_strnatcmp.c > Log: > WinCE port from Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I think this question deserves an answer - is this assert legit No. It

Re: APR WCE take 3

2002-02-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:24 PM > Finally, I don't have a ton of time, and I'd love to see these finished this > month. Others understand Win32 sockets API as well if not better than I, so > I'm attaching the network aspects of your patch

Re: APR WCE take 3

2002-02-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
From: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:24 PM > Going back to take two... > > I'm reviewing and committing so changes to occur fairly shortly don't create > extra hassles later applying these patches. > > Some are trivial, some are very close to rights

Re: APR WCE take 3

2002-02-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
Going back to take two... I'm reviewing and committing so changes to occur fairly shortly don't create extra hassles later applying these patches. Some are trivial, some are very close to rights. I'm committing those tonight. Some need more review. I'm uncomfortable with one aspect or another

Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/unix mktemp.c

2002-02-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
++1, would you care to make it so :-? - Original Message - From: "Aaron Bannert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 7:44 PM Subject: Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/unix mktemp.c > On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:34:14PM -0600,

Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/unix mktemp.c

2002-02-12 Thread Aaron Bannert
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 07:34:14PM -0600, William Rowe wrote: > A question for the list - are we really working in microsecond resolutions? > (Win32 is to the nearest 10 microseconds, I'm guessing others aren't that > precise.) If so, what would you choose as a divisor, since we could certainly >

Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/win32 open.c

2002-02-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
I'm near certain we want to fall over gracefully here, correct??? > wrowe 02/02/11 17:32:55 > > Modified:file_io/win32 open.c > Log: > stdfoo handles are unsupported on WinCE. Submitted by Mladen Turk > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > I believe the patch for CE is wrong is

Re: cvs commit: apr/file_io/unix mktemp.c

2002-02-12 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
A question for the list - are we really working in microsecond resolutions? (Win32 is to the nearest 10 microseconds, I'm guessing others aren't that precise.) If so, what would you choose as a divisor, since we could certainly pick a better divisor than USEC_PER_SEC for randomness. > wrowe