APACHE PORTABLE RUNTIME (APR) LIBRARY STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/08/19 21:38:46 $]
Release:
0.9.0-dev : in progress
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
2.0a8 : released November 20, 2000
2.0a7 : released October 8, 2000
2.0a6 : r
APRUTIL LIBRARY STATUS: -*-text-*-
Last modified at [$Date: 2002/05/31 00:13:52 $]
Release:
0.9.0-dev : in progress
2.0a9 : released December 12, 2000
RELEASE SHOWSTOPPERS:
* Need apu_compat.h to track the latest renames
Status: some
when the dbm type is invalid?
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Hi,
I have a problem about handle leak related to threads on Windows2000/XP.
Excerpt from MSVC help;
"Like the Win32 ExitThread API, _endthreadex does not close the thread handle.
Therefore, when you use _beginthreadex and _endthreadex,
you must close the thread handle by calling the Win32 CloseH
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:43:10AM -0400, Jeff Trawick wrote:
> when the dbm type is invalid?
Yup... it definitely should.
Note that apr_dbm still has more work to do to enable multiple dbms. If you
look inside apr_dbm.c, you can see some the funky code.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.ly
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 05:46:55PM -0700, Blair Zajac wrote:
> Is there any reason for SVN to push for apr-util to upgrade it's expat
> from 1.95.1 to 1.95.4 given that we use it. Several points:
That would be great. If you can help with patches for upgrading apr-util's
expat, then fantastic. I'l
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:47:55AM -0500, Jon Trowbridge wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-08-22 at 11:29, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> > In short, it'd be possible for a layout to have apr-0 as the
> > library name, but it isn't the default.
But it will return to the default. Since APR is primarily a library,
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 02:38:50PM +0200, Sébastien Bonnegent wrote:
> sure, to lock the shared memory area, I have to use the apr_anylock_t
> structure
> but I haven't found documentation on the different lock type...
> and it seems that this structure is not very used in the apache source...
Th
apr_snprintf and apr_vsnprintf are not compliant with the POSIX snprint
standard currently. There are two problems. 1) a length of 0 should
allow the buffer to be NULL, and it should return the computed length of
the requested string. This doesn't currently happen. 2) Specifying a
string pre
+1 on fixing both.
david
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, August 22, 2002 8:07 PM
Subject: apr_snprintf not compliant
>
> apr_snprintf and apr_vsnprintf are not compliant with the POSIX snprint
> standard currently. There are two problems. 1) a leng
Hi --
I happened to discover that calling apr_global_mutex_trylock()
caused a core dump (I'm using Solaris 8, but that doesn't really
matter here). It's because line 917 in the apr_proc_mutex_trylock()
function in apr/locks/unix/proc_mutex.c calls:
mutex->meth->tryacquire(mutex)
but the tryacqu
David Reid wrote:
+1 on fixing both.
Same here.
--
Brane Äibej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
Hi --
OK, pursuant to my previous email, here's a stab at an implementation
of proc_mutex_proc_pthread_tryacquire(). Mostly I studied
apr_thread_mutex_trylock() and proc_mutex_proc_pthread_acquire()
to see what they were doing, plus read the man page a bit
on what pthread_mutex_consistent_np()
On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 08:34:17PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> gstein 2002/08/22 13:34:16
>...
> * change the default APR layout to support parallel installation;
> rename the old layout to "classic"
Note that I put this back to the default, after Thom's/Justin's changes
moved t
Okay. I think APR is at a point where I can roll a 0.9.0 tarball. Anybody
have any comments on what is obviously missing from getting that snap/roll
completed?
I'm going to start a "procedures" doc for that as I go.
Mostly, I'm looking for something like, "um. don't we need FOO to at least
enable
15 matches
Mail list logo
