Greg Marr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It isn't clear from the docs what the effect would be of passing
> APR_IPV4_ADDR_OK | APR_IPV6_ADDR_OK for the flags parameter.
I'll make it clear in the docs that they are mutually exclusive.
Thanks,
--
Jeff Trawick | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Born in Roswell..
At 02:17 PM 9/20/2002, Jeff Trawick wrote:
Does anyone have concerns about the API? There is still some logic
cleanup to be done before committing anyway.
+ * @param flags Special processing flags:
+ *
+ * APR_IPV4_ADDR_OK first query for IPv4 addresses;
only look
+ *
With the following patch to mod_proxy and APR, I saw drastic
improvements to proxy throughput because mod_proxy was able to tell
APR that we should only look for IPv6 addresses if the target has no
IPv4 address. (Currently, the way we maintain the capability of
talking to IPv6 nodes is to ask geta
OK, sure. But you aren't using the -framework option, cheater. :-)
-wsv
On Friday, September 20, 2002, at 02:26 AM, Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 10:53 PM, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
Pier, frameworks do provide the right information for all versions,
but th
On Thursday, September 19, 2002, at 10:53 PM, Wilfredo Sanchez wrote:
Pier, frameworks do provide the right information for all versions,
but there is no compiler flag in OS X to build and link against an old
version, which is moderately lame. I do think it would be swell if
the GNU folks cou
