> > >>
> > >> Better that we document which returned apr_foo_t's are threadsafe,
> > >> which ones are not,
> > >
> > > Yep.
> >
> > Nah. Subversion was doing something incredibly stupid. We were
> > walking up the pools until it found the global_pool and then created
> > the apr_xlate_t in th
> >>
> >> Better that we document which returned apr_foo_t's are threadsafe,
> >> which ones are not,
> >
> > Yep.
>
> Nah. Subversion was doing something incredibly stupid. We were
> walking up the pools until it found the global_pool and then created
> the apr_xlate_t in there and just reus
--On Friday, November 8, 2002 10:58 AM -0500 Bill Stoddard
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This type of bug is going to bite us over and over.
Does that mean we make every object threadsafe? IMHO, No.
Oh, I agree for sure.
Better that we document which returned apr_foo_t's are threadsafe,
which one
[Context: we are discussing the creation of an APACHE_2_0_RELEASE
branch and forking off API-breaking changes to a 2.1-dev branch. Greg's
question goes to APR, which is why it's cc'ed. Please keep this cross
posted thread about how Apache and APR versioning interact on topic :-]
At 11:01 AM 11/8
> > At 08:33 AM 11/8/2002, you wrote:
>
> >> --On Friday, November 8, 2002 4:46 AM +0100 Sander Striker
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> > Bringing this up here for obvious reasons...
> >> >
> >> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=974
> >> >
> >> > "Attempting to us
> --On Friday, November 8, 2002 4:46 AM +0100 Sander Striker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Bringing this up here for obvious reasons...
> >
> > http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=974
> >
> > "Attempting to use mod_dav_svn with Apache's worker MPM has revealed
> > that the
Hi.
I looked in the 'testqueue.c' sample from apr-util package (I checked out
it yesterday from the CVS). There is defined a function
consumer(apr_thread_t *thd, void *data)
which is used to get elements from the queue. *data is then casted to:
apr_queue_t *q = (apr_queue_t*)data;
Then on line
--On Friday, November 8, 2002 4:46 AM +0100 Sander Striker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bringing this up here for obvious reasons...
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=974
"Attempting to use mod_dav_svn with Apache's worker MPM has revealed
that the UTF8 conversions are not thread
Bringing this up here for obvious reasons...
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=974
"Attempting to use mod_dav_svn with Apache's worker MPM has revealed
that the UTF8 conversions are not thread safe.
http://subversion.tigris.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=dev&msgNo=24986
The
